Washington · November 3, 2026 general election · Statewide ballot measure
Initiative Measure No. IP26-645: what your vote means
State and local taxes. On every Washington ballot. Official sources checked October 26, 2026.
Initiative Measure No. IP26-645 · Initiative to the People
State and local taxes
Heads up: voting YES on this measure repeals an existing law, the 2026 state tax on individual income over $1,000,000. Voting NO keeps that law in place.
Initiative Measure No. IP26-645 concerns state and local taxes. This measure would repeal a 9.9% tax on annual individual income over $1,000,000; prohibit taxes measured by individual income and taxes on individual income or the receipt of individual income; and define “income.” This measure would decrease funding for public K-12 education, higher education (including universities and community colleges), and human services (primarily healthcare). Should this measure be enacted into law?
As printed in the 2026 Voters’ Pamphlet (ballot title plus the public investment impact disclosure required by RCW 29A.72.050).
A YES vote means:
The 9.9% state tax on individual income over $1,000,000, passed by the Legislature in 2026 and scheduled to begin in 2028, would be repealed before it takes effect. State and local governments would also be prohibited from imposing taxes on individual income.
A NO vote means:
Current law stays as it is: the 2026 tax of 9.9% on individual income over $1,000,000 would begin in calendar year 2028, and no new ban on income taxes would be added.
What it would change
- Who is affected: people with Washington taxable income over $1,000,000 a year would not owe the 9.9% tax set to begin in 2028. OFM’s estimate assumes about 30,000 taxpayers.
- Taxes: repeals the 9.9% tax and prohibits state and local taxes on individual income, on the receipt of income, or measured by an individual’s income. It defines “income” as “any gain or benefit measured in money derived from an individual’s capital, labor, property, or other source.”
- Not changed: the other tax changes passed with the 2026 law, such as sales-tax exemptions for diapers, over-the-counter drugs, and hygiene products and a larger small-business tax credit, would stay in place, according to the Attorney General’s explanatory statement.
- Fiscal impact (OFM estimate): a loss of $11.4 billion in state revenue over state fiscal years 2027–2031, including $377 million that would have gone to the Fair Start for Kids account for childcare and early learning. OFM estimates no impact on local revenue.
- State costs (OFM estimate): about $150 million in net state agency savings over the same five years, mostly because the Department of Revenue would no longer administer the tax. If approved, the measure takes effect December 3, 2026.
Official arguments, summarized
Short neutral summaries of the arguments printed in the official voters’ pamphlet. The committees that wrote them are responsible for their content. Read the full text at the link below.
Argument for
Supporters say voters have rejected a state income tax many times, that the tax could later be expanded to more people, and that a YES vote keeps the 2026 tax credits and exemptions while repealing the income tax.
Written by: Chris Gildon, State Senator; Jesse Proudman; Patti Mann; Viet Nguyen; Semmelle Abraham; Julie H. Olds
Argument against
Opponents say the measure mainly benefits the highest earners, would reduce funding for schools, healthcare, and childcare, and could raise costs for working families and small businesses.
Written by: Janie White, Washington Education Association; Matt Hipp; Rosa Potts; April Sims, Washington State Labor Council; Thom Garrard; Lindsay Johnson · no645.com
Arguments and rebuttals for IP26-645, 2026 Voters’ Pamphlet (PDF)
Who supports it and who opposes it
These lists come from official campaign filings (registered committees) and public endorsements, each linked to its source. They are not complete, and SaveYourState does not endorse anyone listed. Lists checked October 30, 2026.
Who supports it
- 47TH DISTRICT REPUBLICANS (47th District GOP) Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 69693 (for IP26-645)
- Let's Go Washington (Sponsored by Brian Heywood) Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 69312 (for IP26-645)
- Skagit Young Republicans (SYR) Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70235 (for IP26-645)
- Straight Talk Republican Caucus of Douglas County Sponsored by Holly Duffy (Straight Talk GOP) Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70317 (for IP26-645)
- Vote Yes Repeal the Income Tax Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70299 (for IP26-645)
Who opposes it
- Children's Campaign Fund Ballot Measure Committee Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70277 (against IP26-645)
- Defend Washington Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70216 (against IP26-645)
- Millionaire's Tax Washington Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 69630 (against IP26-645)
- No on 645 Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 69832 (against IP26-645)
- Pacific County Voices Uniting (PCVU) Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70258 (against IP26-645)
- Permanent Defense PAC Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70315 (against IP26-645)
- Planned Parenthood Advocates Of Greater Washington PAC Sponsored by Planned Parenthood Advocates of Greater Washington and North Idaho Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70190 (against IP26-645)
- Seattle DSA PAC (SDSA PAC) Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70171 (against IP26-645)
- Seattle Indivisible Washington Public Disclosure Commission: committee registration 70173 (against IP26-645)
- Snohomish County Democratic Party Washington Public Disclosure Commission: registrations 70209 (campaign) and 70236 (operations) of the Snohomish County Democratic Party, both against IP26-645
Official sources
- Online Voters’ Guide: statewide measures
- Ballot title and summary, Attorney General (PDF)
- Full text of the initiative (PDF)
- Explanatory statement, Attorney General (PDF)
- Fiscal impact statement, Office of Financial Management (PDF)
- Public investment impact disclosure, Attorney General (PDF)
SaveYourState is independent and nonpartisan, not a government site, and does not take positions on ballot measures. This explainer describes effects only, using the official ballot title, explanatory statement, full text, and fiscal impact statement. If anything here differs from those documents, the official documents control.