SB 1065: Creates provisions relating to utility facility relocation

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

SS/SCS/SB 1065 - The act modifies and creates new provisions relating to utility facility relocation. The State Road Fund shall be used for reimbursing for certain utility relocation costs, as described in the act. The Department of Transportation shall reimburse non-rate-regulated providers for any labor costs associated with facility relocation that are required due to road maintenance, construction, or other right-of-way work activity. Notification requirements by the Department and response requirements by the non-rate-regulated provider are described in the act. The Department of Transportation shall reimburse a non-rate-regulated provider for the provider's labor costs for the facility relocation not to exceed specific amounts described in the act. This provision shall expire on July 1, 2031. A non-rate-regulated provider shall provide invoices to the Department for the provider's labor costs for the fiscal year in which such work occurs. Payment of the invoices is described in the act. If a provider's total labor costs exceed the specified amounts under the act, such payments shall be prorated. The Department shall be required to publicly disclose on an annual basis no later than July 31st a list of facility reimbursement invoices received, as described in the act. The act shall not require the Department to reimburse a non-rate-regulated provider for the removal or relocation of facilities placed in the public right-of-way in violation of state law or local permitting requirements. Under the act, subject to certain exceptions, the removal and relocation of utility facilities as a result of construction projects required by the Highways and Transportation Commission shall be made at the expense of the owners unless otherwise provided by the Commission. Currently, if the owner fails to relocate the utility facilities, the cost of relocating the utility facilities shall be collected from the owner. Under the act, the cost of relocating the utility facilities shall be the responsibility of the Commission or the owner. JULIA SHEVELEVA

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Republican 1

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

1. May 15, 2026Informal Calendar S Bills for Perfection
2. April 20, 2026SS for SCS S offered (Brown-26)--(4816S.12F)
3. April 20, 2026SA 1 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (McCreery)--(4816S12.01S)
4. April 20, 2026SA 2 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (Brown-26)--(4816S12.02S)
5. April 20, 2026Bill Placed on Informal Calendar
6. March 31, 2026Bill Placed on Informal Calendar
7. March 25, 2026Reported from S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee w/SCS
8. March 3, 2026SCS Voted Do Pass S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee (4816S.02C)
9. February 24, 2026Hearing Conducted S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee
10. February 10, 2026Hearing Cancelled S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee
11. January 15, 2026Second Read and Referred S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee
12. January 7, 2026S First Read

Showing 12 most recent of 13 actions. Full history