Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Virginia · 2026 Regular Session · Bill

HB 816: Zoning; by-right multifamily residential development in areas zoned for commercial use.

Passed one chamber Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 816 is a bill introduced in the Virginia House on January 13, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Zoning; by-right multifamily residential development in areas zoned for commercial use. Primary sponsor: Dan Helmer (Democratic). It lists 4 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (March 4, 2026): Defeated by Senate.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

Zoning; by-right multifamily development. Requires a locality to include provisions in its zoning ordinance allowing for the by-right development and construction of multifamily residential uses and mixed-use developments that include both residential and commercial uses on at least 75 percent of all land contained in commercial or business zoning district classifications, including any land contained in commercial or business zoning district classifications that allow for the by-right development and construction of single-family residential uses. The bill provides that such provisions shall not (i) apply in underdeveloped areas that are covered by a tree canopy of at least 60 percent; (ii) impose more stringent land use requirements for such development than would otherwise be required; (iii) require that a special exception, special use, or conditional use permit be obtained for such development; (iv) require a lower height than the greater of the height of the tallest existing building within 500 feet or the height that would otherwise be allowed; (v) require more than one parking space per unit; (vi) require larger setbacks than the existing building in the locality with the smallest setbacks; or (vii) require more costly amenities or design features than would otherwise be required for multifamily or mixed-use buildings.The bill also (a) stipulates that the review and approval of such development shall be done administratively by the locality's staff; (b) requires that the zoning ordinance provisions must exempt any proposed development that converts an existing building to a multifamily residential use from any setback, height, or frontage requirements; (c) prohibits the zoning ordinance provisions to require any proposed development to dedicate some or all of its ground floor space to commercial uses; and (d) provides that any proposed residential development that dedicates a minimum of 10 percent of the total number of housing units to affordable housing may be offered application incentives by the locality. The bill also prohibits localities from approving any commercial or business use on a property adjacent to the approved multifamily residential development that is different from the use that had been established at the time the multifamily residential development was approved.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 5

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Dan HelmerPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Alex AskewCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse95
Karen Keys-GamarraCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Irene ShinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse8
Josh ThomasCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse21

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Defeated by Senate
  2. Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute as amended
  3. Senator Favola Amendments agreed to
  4. Reading of amendments waived
  5. Floor offered Senator Favola Amendments
  6. Local Government Substitute agreed to
  7. Read third time
  8. Passed by for the day Block Vote (Voice Vote)
  9. Constitutional reading dispensed Block Vote (on 2nd reading) (40-Y 0-N 0-A)
  10. Rules suspended
  11. Committee substitute printed 26108921D-S1
  12. Reported from Local Government with substitute (9-Y 6-N)

Showing 12 most recent of 29 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source