South Dakota · November 3, 2026 general election · Statewide ballot measure
Constitutional Amendment L: what your vote means
60% vote required for constitutional amendments. On every South Dakota ballot. Official sources checked October 21, 2026.
Constitutional Amendment L · Legislatively referred constitutional amendment
60% vote required for constitutional amendments
Heads up: voting YES on this measure removes simple-majority approval for future constitutional amendments, which would need 60% instead.
An Amendment to the South Dakota Constitution Requiring that a Proposed Constitutional Amendment or Revision Receive an Affirmative Vote of Sixty Percent of the Votes Cast.
Attorney General’s title as printed in the 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet, South Dakota Secretary of State.
A YES vote means:
Future constitutional amendments and revisions would need 60% of the votes cast to pass, instead of a simple majority.
A NO vote means:
Constitutional amendments and revisions would continue to pass with a simple majority of votes cast.
What it would change
- Who is affected: voters, and sponsors of future constitutional amendments, whether citizen-initiated or from the Legislature.
- What it removes: simple-majority approval for constitutional amendments.
- Background (pamphlet): voters rejected a 55% threshold in 2018 and a 60% threshold for amendments with fiscal impacts in 2022.
- Fiscal impact: No official fiscal note is published in the 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet for this legislative amendment.
Official arguments, summarized
Short neutral summaries of the arguments printed in the official voters’ pamphlet. The committees that wrote them are responsible for their content. Read the full text at the link below.
Argument for
Supporters say a higher threshold ensures only changes with broad support enter the constitution.
Written by: John Hughes, State Representative; Dale Bartscher, South Dakota Right to Life; Nathan Sanderson, South Dakota Retailers
Argument against
Opponents say it would let a minority block changes and make it harder for citizens to use the initiative process.
Written by: Chase Jensen, Dakota Rural Action; Ryan Rolfs, South Dakota Education Association
Pro and con statements on Amendment L, 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet (PDF)
Who supports it and who opposes it
These lists come from official campaign filings (registered committees) and public endorsements, each linked to its source. They are not complete, and SaveYourState does not endorse anyone listed. Lists checked October 30, 2026.
Who supports it
- John Hughes (R) State Representative, District 13 Statement for Amendment L, 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet (PDF, p. 5) · party: sdlegislature.gov
- South Dakota Retailers Statement for Amendment L, 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet (PDF, p. 5)
- South Dakota Right to Life Statement for Amendment L, 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet (PDF, p. 5)
Who opposes it
- Dakota Rural Action Statement against Amendment L, 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet (PDF, p. 5)
- South Dakota Education Association Statement against Amendment L, 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet (PDF, p. 5)
Official sources
- 2026 Ballot Question Pamphlet (Attorney General explanation and pro/con statements) (PDF)
- Full text: HJR 5003 (2025), South Dakota Legislature
- South Dakota Secretary of State: 2026 ballot questions
SaveYourState is independent and nonpartisan, not a government site, and does not take positions on ballot measures. This explainer describes effects only, using the official ballot title, explanatory statement, full text, and fiscal impact statement. If anything here differs from those documents, the official documents control.