Massachusetts · 194th Legislature (2025-2026) · Bill
H 4009: An Act authorizing the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority to provide sewer services to a certain parcel of land in the town of Sharon
Enacted Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
H 4009 is a bill introduced in the Massachusetts House on March 31, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: An Act authorizing the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority to provide sewer services to a certain parcel of land in the town of Sharon. Primary sponsor: Ted Philips (Democratic). It lists 1 additional sponsor. Most recent recorded action (November 6, 2025): Signed by the Governor, Chapter 54 of the Acts of 2025.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.
By Representative Philips of Sharon, a petition (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Edward R. Philips and Michael F. Rush for legislation to authorize the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority to provide sewer services to a certain parcel of land in the town of Sharon. Environment and Natural Resources.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 2
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ted Philips | Primary sponsor | Democratic | House | 8th Norfolk |
| Mike Rush | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | Norfolk and Suffolk |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Signed by the Governor, Chapter 54 of the Acts of 2025
- Enacted and laid before the Governor
- Enacted
- Emergency preamble adopted
- Emergency preamble adopted
- Read third and passed to be engrossed
- Ordered to a third reading
- Amendment (Senate Rules) rejected
- Motion to reconsider prevailed
- Read second, amended (as recommended by the committee on Senate Rules), ordered to a third reading, read third and passed to be engrossed
- Rules suspended
- Committee reported that the matter be placed in the Orders of the Day for the next session with an amendment
Showing 12 most recent of 22 actions. Full history