Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill
SB 25-314: Recovery Audit Contractor Program
Enacted Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
SB 25-314 is a bill introduced in the Colorado Senate on April 25, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Recovery Audit Contractor Program. Primary sponsor: Emily Sirota (Democratic), Shannon Bird, Jeff Bridges (Democratic), Barbara Kirkmeyer (Republican). It lists 10 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 3, 2025): Governor Signed.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.
The act allows the department of health care policy and financing (department) to, on behalf of the department, contract with a recovery audit contractor (RAC) vendor to conduct RAC audits of medicaid providers (providers). RAC audits may only review claims that are no more than 3 years past the expiration date of the timely filing period. The department may only review claims that fall outside of this 3-year time frame if required by a federal audit. The act limits the number of audits a provider may undergo each year and the number of medical records that can be requested for a given audit. If the RAC vendor identifies preliminary findings during the RAC audit, the RAC vendor must send the provider a report detailing the preliminary findings, the rationale for the preliminary findings, and the methodology for how any overpayments were calculated and determined. The act allows a provider that received preliminary findings following a complex audit to request an exit conference to discuss the preliminary findings with the RAC vendor and the department to resolve the concerns detailed in the preliminary findings prior to undergoing an informal reconsideration of the preliminary findings. A provider is required to participate in an informal reconsideration before filing a formal appeal regarding the department's findings during an RAC audit. The department is required to submit an annual report to the joint budget committee containing information about the RAC audits conducted and the department's involvement in those RAC audits. The act, in the department's budget for medical and long-term care services for medical-eligible individuals, decreases the cash funds appropriation from recoveries and recoupments by $20,900,588 and increases the cash funds appropriation from the recovery audit contractor recoveries cash fund by $20,900,588. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 8 · Republican 4
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Sirota | Primary sponsor | Democratic | House | 9 |
| Shannon Bird | Primary sponsor | Not applicable (committee) | — | — |
| Jeff Bridges | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 26 |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Primary sponsor | Republican | Senate | 23 |
| Judy Amabile | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 18 |
| Andy Boesenecker | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 53 |
| Kyle Brown | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 12 |
| Marc Catlin | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 5 |
| Lisa Frizell | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 2 |
| William Lindstedt | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 25 |
| P. Lundeen | Co-sponsor | Not applicable (committee) | — | — |
| Kyle Mullica | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 24 |
| Marc Snyder | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 12 |
| Rick Taggart | Co-sponsor | Republican | House | 55 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Governor Signed
- Sent to the Governor
- Signed by the President of the Senate
- Signed by the Speaker of the House
- House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
- House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
- House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
- Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
- Introduced In House - Assigned to Appropriations
- Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
- Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
- Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Appropriations