Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

SB 25-189: Require Jury to Determine Prior Convictions

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 25-189 is a bill introduced in the Colorado Senate on March 3, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Require Jury to Determine Prior Convictions. Primary sponsor: Cecelia Espenoza (Democratic), Matt Soper (Republican), Marc Snyder (Democratic), Larry Liston (Republican). It lists 4 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 2, 2025): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

Under existing law, a person convicted of certain prior offenses may be adjudged a habitual criminal and subject to enhanced sentencing. The act requires a jury, in a habitual proceeding that is separate from the trial of the charged substantive offense and for the purpose of determining whether the defendant is a habitual criminal, to determine whether the defendant has been previously convicted as alleged, whether the convictions were separately brought and tried, and whether the convictions arose out of separate and distinct criminal episodes. The habitual proceeding must be conducted before the same jury impaneled to try the substantive offense; except that, when necessary and as constitutionally permissible, a new jury may be impaneled. If a new jury is impaneled, the court shall hold the habitual proceeding as soon as practicable. The act repeals the process for a judge to try the issue of whether a person is a habitual offender when the prosecuting attorney learns of a prior felony conviction after a guilty verdict but prior to the person being sentenced. The act appropriates $17,500 from the general fund to the judicial department for court costs, jury costs, court-appointed counsel, and reimbursements for vacated convictions. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 6 · Republican 2

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Cecelia EspenozaPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Matt SoperPrimary sponsorRepublicanHouse54
Marc SnyderPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate12
Larry ListonPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate10
Michael CarterCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse36
Monica DuranCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Meg FroelichCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Steven WoodrowCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse2

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the President of the Senate
  3. Sent to the Governor
  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  5. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  6. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
  7. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
  8. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations
  9. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  10. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
  11. Senate Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  12. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

Showing 12 most recent of 16 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source