Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · Bill

SB 189: Automated Decision-Making Technology

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 189 is a bill introduced in the Colorado Senate on May 1, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Automated Decision-Making Technology. Primary sponsor: Brianna Titone (Democratic), Mark Baisley (Republican), Monica Duran (Democratic), Jennifer Bacon (Democratic), Robert Rodriguez (Democratic), James Coleman (Democratic). It lists 39 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 14, 2026): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

In 2024, the general assembly enacted Senate Bill 24-205, which created consumer protections in interactions with artificial intelligence systems. The act repeals and reenacts those provisions with new requirements regarding the use of automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions.     The act defines an 'automated decision-making technology' (ADMT) as a technology that processes personal data and uses computation to generate output, including predictions, recommendations, classifications, rankings, scores, or other information that is used to make, guide, or assist a decision, judgment, or determination concerning an individual. The act defines a 'consequential decision' as a decision that relates to an individual's access to, eligibility for, or compensation related to education, employment, housing, financial or lending services, insurance, health-care services, or essential government services and public benefits.     The act requires the developer of an ADMT (developer) that is used to materially influence a consequential decision (covered ADMT), starting January 1, 2027, to provide a deployer of a covered ADMT (deployer) with technical documentation describing the covered ADMT's intended uses, categories of training data, known limitations, and instructions for appropriate use and human review. Developers must notify deployers of material updates or modifications to the covered ADMT. Both developers and deployers are required to retain records necessary to demonstrate compliance with the act for at least 3 years.     The act establishes consumer notice requirements, mandating that deployers provide clear and conspicuous notice to consumers at the point of interaction with a covered ADMT. A deployer is required to provide a consumer with a plain language description of a covered ADMT's role within 30 days after the covered ADMT makes a consequential decision that results in an adverse outcome for the consumer. The attorney general must adopt rules to clarify these post-adverse outcome disclosure requirements by January 1, 2027.     Consumers have the right to request personal data and correction of factually incorrect personal data used by a covered ADMT. The act also grants consumers the right to request meaningful human review and reconsideration following a covered ADMT making a consequential decision resulting in an adverse outcome.     The attorney general is directed to enforce the act through the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act', and a violation of the act is deemed a deceptive trade practice. Before initiating an action before January 1, 2030, the attorney general must provide the developer or deployer with a 60-day notice and opportunity to cure the alleged violation, if a cure is deemed possible. The act does not create a new private right of action but establishes how fault is allocated between developers and deployers in civil actions alleging unlawful discrimination under existing law.     Specified entities are exempted from the requirements of the act to the extent the entities comply with other legal obligations.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 32 · Republican 12

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Brianna TitonePrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse27
Mark BaisleyPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate4
Monica DuranPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Jennifer BaconPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Robert RodriguezPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate32
James ColemanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Adrienne BenavidezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate21
Andy BoeseneckerCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Jeff BridgesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Jarvis CaldwellCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse20
Michael CarterCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse36
Chad CliffordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse37
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Regina EnglishCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Tony ExumCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Ava FlanellCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse14
Lisa FrizellCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate2
Lori GoldsteinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse29
Ryan GonzalezCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse50
Eliza HamrickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse61
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
Barbara KirkmeyerCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate23
Chris KolkerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate16
Sheila LiederCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse28
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
William LindstedtCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Janice MarchmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate15
Julie McCluskieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse13
Karen McCormickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse11
Kenny NguyenCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse33
Amy PaschalCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse18
Rod PeltonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate35
Byron PeltonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate1
Janice RichCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate7
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Cleave SimpsonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate6
Scott SlaughCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse64
Lesley SmithCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse49
Marc SnyderCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate12
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Elizabeth VelascoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse57
Ty WinterCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse47

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  5. Sent to the Governor
  6. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  7. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
  8. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
  9. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
  10. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  11. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
  12. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

Showing 12 most recent of 15 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source