Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · Bill

SB 134: Payment Card Networks' Fees

Vetoed Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Vetoed

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 134 is a bill introduced in the Colorado Senate on March 4, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Payment Card Networks' Fees. Primary sponsor: Steven Woodrow (Democratic), Jenny Willford (Democratic), Tammy Story (Democratic), Lesley Smith (Democratic), Kenny Nguyen (Democratic), Lorena García (Democratic), Meg Froelich (Democratic), Kyle Brown (Democratic), Max Brooks (Republican), Mike Weissman (Democratic), Dylan Roberts (Democratic), Judy Amabile (Democratic), Julie McCluskie (Democratic), Monica Duran (Democratic), William Lindstedt (Democratic), Iman Jodeh (Democratic). It lists 6 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 3, 2026): Governor Vetoed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

An interchange fee is a fee established, charged, or received by a payment card network for the purpose of compensating an issuer for its involvement in an electronic payment transaction. The act states that a payment card network shall not, whether directly or indirectly:Establish, charge, or include in a fee schedule an interchange fee if:The interchange fee is or includes a percentage multiplied by the gross dollar amount of a transaction conducted with a debit card or credit card; andThe fee does not exclude from the gross dollar amount of the transaction any amount attributable to a tax on the transaction; orIncrease the rate or amount of fees that apply to the nontax portion of a transaction in an attempt to, or in a manner that would, circumvent the prohibition on interchange fees established by the act.     The act exempts electronic payment transactions involving a debit card or credit card issued by a person, or agent of a person, that issues a debit card or credit card to a cardholder (issuer) that:Did not, during any point in the previous calendar year, hold consolidated worldwide banking and nonbanking assets, including assets of affiliates, other than trust assets under management, of more than $60 billion; orAs of February 1, 2026, had contracted to brand the card with the brand of a financial institution chartered or authorized to do business in this state that did not, during any point in the previous calendar year, hold consolidated worldwide banking and nonbanking assets, including assets of affiliates, other than trust assets under management, of more than $60 billion.An issuer that satisfies either of these exemption descriptions must identify to a payment card network all of the issuer's debit cards and credit cards that are used for exempted transactions. The payment card network shall not, whether directly or indirectly through an agent, contract, requirement, condition, penalty, technological specification, or inducement or otherwise:Deny such a card access to transaction processing systems; orImpose any fee increase or penalty on the issuer or on a financial institution branded on the card for any costs of upgrades or configurations to payment and processing systems that may be necessary to comply with the act with respect to such cards.     If a payment card network violates the act's prohibitions, a merchant, consumer, or other person that is injured as a result of the violation may bring a civil action against the payment card network. The act sets forth the penalties to be awarded in such an action.     For the 2026-27 state fiscal year and each state fiscal year thereafter, the act requires each retail business that has more than 500 employees statewide on the effective date of the act to apply any savings resulting from the act to reducing prices for consumers or investing in employee wages or benefits.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 20 · Republican 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Steven WoodrowPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse2
Jenny WillfordPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse34
Tammy StoryPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Lesley SmithPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse49
Kenny NguyenPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse33
Lorena GarcíaPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Meg FroelichPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Kyle BrownPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Max BrooksPrimary sponsorRepublicanHouse45
Mike WeissmanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Dylan RobertsPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate8
Judy AmabilePrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Julie McCluskiePrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse13
Monica DuranPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse23
William LindstedtPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Iman JodehPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Lindsey DaughertyCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate19
Karen McCormickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse11
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Vetoed
  2. Signed by the President of the Senate
  3. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  6. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
  7. House Committee on Finance Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
  8. Introduced In House - Assigned to Finance
  9. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  10. Senate Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  11. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
  12. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 04/27/2026 - No Amendments

Showing 12 most recent of 35 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source