Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill
HB 25-1329: Foreign Third-Party Litigation Financing
Enacted Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
HB 25-1329 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on April 11, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Foreign Third-Party Litigation Financing. Primary sponsor: Julie Gonzales (Democratic), Lisa Frizell (Republican), Matt Soper (Republican), Javier Mabrey (Democratic). It lists 10 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 3, 2025): Governor Signed.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.
The act requires a foreign third-party litigation funder (funder) that enters into a litigation financing agreement (agreement) to disclose and submit certain information to the Colorado attorney general. The act prohibits a funder from: Utilizing a domestic entity as a means of providing litigation financing to a party or attorney in a civil action; Deciding, influencing, or directing an attorney with respect to the conduct of the civil action or any settlement or resolution of the civil action; Assigning rights to profits other than the right to receive a share of the proceeds awarded in the civil action as outlined in the agreement; or Sharing proprietary information, or information affecting national security interests obtained as a result of the agreement for the civil action, with anyone who is not a party or an attorney. The act subjects an agreement to discovery under the Colorado rules of civil procedure and Colorado rules of evidence. The act deems an agreement entered into by a funder void if the funder fails to comply with the activity and disclosure requirements. A funder's failure to comply with the requirements of this act constitutes a deceptive or unfair trade practice. The act allows the attorney general to bring legal action against a funder to enforce compliance with the act, impose fines, prohibit a funder from operating in this state, or impose any other sanction the attorney general deems appropriate for a violation of the activity or disclosure requirements. The act requires the department of law to include information about funders in its annual "SMART Act" hearing annually, beginning in January 2026. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 10 · Republican 3
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Gonzales | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 34 |
| Lisa Frizell | Primary sponsor | Republican | Senate | 2 |
| Matt Soper | Primary sponsor | Republican | House | 54 |
| Javier Mabrey | Primary sponsor | Democratic | House | 1 |
| Jennifer Bacon | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 7 |
| Jarvis Caldwell | Co-sponsor | Republican | House | 20 |
| Chad Clifford | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 37 |
| Cecelia Espenoza | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 4 |
| Lorena García | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 35 |
| Naquetta Ricks | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 40 |
| M. Rutinel | Co-sponsor | Not applicable (committee) | — | — |
| Emily Sirota | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 9 |
| Tammy Story | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 25 |
| Yara Zokaie | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 52 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Governor Signed
- Signed by the Speaker of the House
- Signed by the President of the Senate
- Sent to the Governor
- Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
- Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations
- Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
- Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
- Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
- House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
- House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
- House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
Showing 12 most recent of 16 actions. Full history