Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1275: Forensic Science Integrity

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1275 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on February 19, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Forensic Science Integrity. Primary sponsor: Lisa Frizell (Republican), Mike Weissman (Democratic), Yara Zokaie (Democratic), Matt Soper (Republican). It lists 50 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 2, 2025): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

The act defines "knowing misconduct" as a voluntary act or omission or series of acts or omissions consciously performed by a crime laboratory employee (employee) as a result of effort or determination in which the employee is aware that the employee's conduct is improper or deceptive and involves mishandling physical evidence or data or results, incorrectly performing forensic testing, presenting misleading or false results, concealing material information, or presenting false sworn testimony about evidence. The act defines a "significant event" as an act or omission by an employee that is a gross deviation from the standard operation procedures or accreditation requirements of the crime laboratory, or requirements in law that were applicable at the time of the act or omission of the employee, that could substantially negatively affect the integrity of the crime laboratory activities. The act requires an employee to report witnessed or discovered knowing misconduct or a significant event (collectively, "wrongful action") within 7 days of witnessing or discovering the wrongful action to the director of the crime laboratory (director) or to the employee's immediate supervisor, who shall report it to the director. A director who receives a report shall investigate the alleged wrongful action. As part of the investigation, the director must compile a list of all cases that the employee worked on. At the conclusion of the investigation, the director shall prepare a written final report. When an investigation is of alleged wrongful action in a pending case, the director shall notify each district attorney who has jurisdiction over the pending case about the investigation. At the conclusion of the investigation, if the investigation determines that the employee did not engage in wrongful action, the director shall deliver the final report to each district attorney who received notice of the investigation and to each district attorney who has jurisdiction over any case that was subject to investigation. If the investigation determines that the employee engaged in wrongful action, the director shall deliver the final report and all discoverable materials to each district attorney who has jurisdiction over any case that the employee worked on in an official capacity. If an investigation concerning wrongful action by a crime laboratory occurred after July 1, 2014, and before July 1, 2025, and the investigation resulted in criminal allegations filed against the employee or a sustained internal affairs action by the department supervising the employee, the director shall, as soon as practicable but no later than September 1, 2025, prepare a final report and provide the final report to all district attorneys with jurisdiction over any criminal case that is identified in the final report that is pending or has resulted in a conviction in that jurisdiction. Upon receipt of a notice from a director about an investigation into alleged wrongful action in a pending case, a district attorney shall notify the defendant in the case of the investigation. If the case involved a crime listed in the "Victim Rights Act", the district attorney shall also notify the victim about the alleged wrongful action, if the charges have been filed but the trial has not begun. A district attorney who receives a final report of an investigation that determines that a crime laboratory employee engaged in wrongful action in any case shall notify the defendant in that case, and each defendant whose case was reviewed as part of the investigation, of the determination of wrongful action. The act establishes a defendant's right to counsel in matters involving an employee's wrongful action and a right to investigate the wrongful action, to request discovery related to the wrongful action, and to seek post-conviction relief based on the wrongful action. The act permits a court to enter a protective order related to discovery requests. The act establishes a process for a defendant convicted in a case involving an employee's wrongful action to petition for post-conviction relief based on the wrongful action. If the defendant's petition for post-conviction relief asserts facts that, if true, demonstrate that a wrongful action was material to the case, the court shall decide the claim upon the merits after an evidentiary hearing. At the evidentiary hearing, the defendant has the burden to show that the employee committed the wrongful action and that the wrongful action is material to the case. If the defendant meets their burden, the court shall vacate the defendant's conviction and grant a new trial. The act makes all records related to an investigation criminal justice records and makes release of the records governed by the existing law governing criminal justice records; except that the custodian of a final report that concludes that a crime laboratory employee engaged in wrongful action may deny inspection of the report if there is an ongoing criminal investigation or criminal case. The act appropriates $140,433 from the general fund to the judicial department for use by the state courts. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 44 · Republican 8

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Lisa FrizellPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate2
Mike WeissmanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Yara ZokaiePrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse52
Matt SoperPrimary sponsorRepublicanHouse54
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Mark BaisleyCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate4
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
S. BirdCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Andy BoeseneckerCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Sean CamachoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse6
John CarsonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate30
Michael CarterCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse36
Chad CliffordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse37
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Lindsey DaughertyCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate19
Cecelia EspenozaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Tony ExumCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Meg FroelichCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Lorena GarcíaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Julie GonzalesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Eliza HamrickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse61
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Junie JosephCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Barbara KirkmeyerCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate23
Sheila LiederCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse28
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
William LindstedtCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Larry ListonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate10
Meghan LukensCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse26
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Janice MarchmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate15
Bob MarshallCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse43
Julie McCluskieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse13
Kyle MullicaCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate24
Amy PaschalCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse18
Rod PeltonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate35
Byron PeltonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate1
Naquetta RicksCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse40
Dylan RobertsCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate8
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Marc SnyderCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate12
Rebekah StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse30
Katie StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse59
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Tom SullivanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate27
Brianna TitoneCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse27
Alex ValdezCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse5
Katie WallaceCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate17

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  6. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
  7. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
  8. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations
  9. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
  10. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  11. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
  12. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

Showing 12 most recent of 14 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source