Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1169: Housing Developments on Faith and Educational Land

Passed one chamber Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1169 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on February 4, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Housing Developments on Faith and Educational Land. Primary sponsor: Tony Exum (Democratic), Julie Gonzales (Democratic), Javier Mabrey (Democratic), Andy Boesenecker (Democratic). It lists 22 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 5, 2025): Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over to 05/08/2025 - No Amendments.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

The bill requires a subject jurisdiction, on or after December 31, 2026, to allow a residential development to be constructed on a qualifying property that does not contain an exempt parcel, subject to an administrative approval process. A subject jurisdiction shall not allow a residential development to be constructed on a qualifying property unless the residential development complies with certain affordability requirements. The bill specifies that a subject jurisdiction shall not: Disallow construction of a residential development on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development is no more than 3 stories or 45 feet tall; Disallow construction of a residential development on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development complies with the height-related standards for the zoning district in which the residential development will be built or any zoning district parcel that is contiguous to the qualifying property on which the residential development will be built; Disallow construction of a residential development based on the number of dwelling units that the residential development will contain, except in accordance with standards listed in the bill; or Apply standards to a residential development on a qualifying property that are more restrictive than the standards the subject jurisdiction applies to similar housing constructed within the subject jurisdiction, including standards related to structure setbacks from property lines; lot coverage or open space; on-site parking requirements; numbers of bedrooms in a multifamily residential development; or on-site landscaping, screening, and buffering requirements; or minimum dwelling units per acre. A subject jurisdiction shall allow the following uses in a residential development on a qualifying property: Childcare; and The provision of recreational, social, or educational services provided by community organizations for use by the residents of the residential development and the surrounding community. A subject jurisdiction may condition additional uses in a residential development on the uses being allowed only on the ground floor of the residential development and the uses occupying no more than 15% of the ground floor area of the residential development. The bill requires a faith-based organization, school district, or state college or university to notify the county assessor that a subject jurisdiction has allowed the construction of a residential development on a qualifying property within the county. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 24

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Tony ExumPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Julie GonzalesPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Javier MabreyPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Andy BoeseneckerPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Sean CamachoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse6
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Cecelia EspenozaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Meg FroelichCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Lorena GarcíaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
William LindstedtCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Karen McCormickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse11
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Gretchen RydinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse38
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Lesley SmithCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse49
Katie StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse59
Rebekah StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse30
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Jenny WillfordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse34
F. WinterCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Steven WoodrowCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse2
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over to 05/08/2025 - No Amendments
  2. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over to 05/05/2025 - No Amendments
  3. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  4. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  5. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  6. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  7. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 04/28/2025 - No Amendments
  8. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  9. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  10. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  11. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  12. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over to 04/21/2025 - No Amendments

Showing 12 most recent of 31 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source