Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1147: Fairness & Transparency in Municipal Court

Vetoed Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Vetoed

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1147 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 29, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Fairness & Transparency in Municipal Court. Primary sponsor: Mike Weissman (Democratic), Judy Amabile (Democratic), Elizabeth Velasco (Democratic), Javier Mabrey (Democratic). It lists 25 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 16, 2025): Governor Vetoed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

The act caps the maximum incarceration sentence for a municipal violation that has a comparable state law crime at the same length as the state-level offense. If a comparable state-level offense does not exist, the maximum period of incarceration is capped at the maximum for a state-level petty offense. Mandatory minimums and increased penalties based on prior convictions are prohibited unless the person is convicted of a municipal offense for which there is a comparable state offense or of an infraction that allows imposition of the same mandatory minimum or increased penalties based on prior convictions. The act also caps a consecutive municipal sentence at 2 times the highest charge in the case. The act clarifies that municipal court defendants have a right to counsel and that municipal defense counsel have the same notice, case information, and opportunity to meet with their clients as do state-level defense counsel. Current law prohibits paying indigent municipal defense counsel on a fixed or flat-fee payment structure if the municipality prosecutes domestic violence cases. The act applies the prohibition to all municipalities. All municipal court proceedings are required to be open to public observation. Virtual observation is required for all in-custody proceedings, and prompt resolution of municipal cases is required. VETOED by Governor 5/16/2025(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 28

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Mike WeissmanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Judy AmabilePrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Elizabeth VelascoPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse57
Javier MabreyPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Michael CarterCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse36
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Regina EnglishCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Cecelia EspenozaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Tony ExumCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Meg FroelichCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Lorena GarcíaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Lindsay GilchristCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse8
Julie GonzalesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Nick HinrichsenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
D. Michaelson JenetCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
Bob MarshallCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse43
Naquetta RicksCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse40
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Tom SullivanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate27
Katie WallaceCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate17
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Vetoed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  6. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
  7. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  8. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
  9. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  10. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
  11. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  12. House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

Showing 12 most recent of 16 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source