Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1138: Protect Victims in Civil Sex Misconduct Suits

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1138 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 29, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Protect Victims in Civil Sex Misconduct Suits. Primary sponsor: Lindsey Daugherty (Democratic), Barbara Kirkmeyer (Republican), Rose Pugliese, Meghan Lukens (Democratic). It lists 46 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (March 13, 2025): Signed by the President of the Senate.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

Under current law, certain evidence of a victim's prior or subsequent sexual conduct is presumed irrelevant and inadmissible in a civil proceeding, but there is an exception for evidence of the victim's prior or subsequent sexual conduct with the defendant. The act eliminates this exception. The act prohibits the admission of evidence of the victim's manner of dress, hairstyle, mode or manner of speech, or lifestyle as evidence of the victim's consent, credibility, or the existence or extent of damages or harm. The party moving to admit evidence presumed irrelevant is required to raise the issue at a pretrial conference and make a prima facie showing that the evidence is relevant for an admissible reason and that discovery is likely to rebut the presumption of inadmissibility. The court is required to allow the nonmoving party to object. If the court allows discovery, the court must issue a protective order that limits the scope of discovery to relevant issues and protect against unwarranted, irrelevant, or overly broad discovery into the alleged victim's sexual conduct or history. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 32 · Republican 12

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Lindsey DaughertyPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate19
Barbara KirkmeyerPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate23
Rose PugliesePrimary sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Meghan LukensPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse26
R. ArmagostCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
S. BirdCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Andy BoeseneckerCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Brandi BradleyCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse39
Jeff BridgesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Scott BrightCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate13
Jarvis CaldwellCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse20
John CarsonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate30
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Monica DuranCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Regina EnglishCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Cecelia EspenozaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Tony ExumCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Lisa FrizellCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate2
Meg FroelichCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Lorena GarcíaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Ryan GonzalezCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse50
Eliza HamrickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse61
Tony HartsookCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse44
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
D. Michaelson JenetCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Rebecca KeltieCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse16
Sheila LiederCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse28
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
William LindstedtCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
P. LundeenCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Matt MartinezCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse62
Tisha MauroCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse46
Julie McCluskieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse13
Byron PeltonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate1
Dylan RobertsCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate8
Robert RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate32
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Cleave SimpsonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate6
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Rebekah StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse30
Katie StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse59
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Brianna TitoneCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse27
Alex ValdezCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse5
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Jenny WillfordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse34
Ty WinterCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse47
Steven WoodrowCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse2

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Signed by the President of the Senate
  2. Sent to the Governor
  3. Governor Signed
  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  6. Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments
  7. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
  8. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
  9. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  10. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
  11. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
  12. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source