Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1114: Defense Review of Tangible Object for Criminal Trial

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1114 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 27, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Defense Review of Tangible Object for Criminal Trial. Primary sponsor: Mike Weissman (Democratic), Julie Gonzales (Democratic), Cecelia Espenoza (Democratic), Michael Carter (Democratic). It lists 10 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (March 26, 2025): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

The act grants a right for defense counsel to review a tangible object related to a criminal case at least 35 days before a trial, except for cases involving sexually exploitative material, and create confidential work product following their review. Law enforcement shall designate a specific location for the evidence viewing and be present during the evidence viewing to ensure chain of custody and integrity of the evidence. The act does not limit the defense's ability to request testing or a hearing, or the court's ability to conduct a hearing, on a tangible piece of evidence. Law enforcement officers and other state officials may record an evidence viewing by either the prosecution or the defense for the purpose of ensuring the chain of custody, integrity, or safety of the evidence held by the law enforcement agency, and must provide notice to the prosecuting authority and defense if a recording occurs. Law enforcement may view the recording for purposes of organization or cataloguing the evidence, or as authorized by a court order. A trial court may enter protective orders relating to a recording of an evidence viewing. When a member of the defense team is viewing evidence and is incidentally recorded on a law enforcement body-worn camera, it is not an interaction with law enforcement for purposes of the body-worn camera statute and is not for the purpose of enforcing the law or investigating possible violations of the law. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 12

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Mike WeissmanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Julie GonzalesPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Cecelia EspenozaPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Michael CarterPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse36
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Monica DuranCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Tony ExumCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Nick HinrichsenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
D. Michaelson JenetCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
Naquetta RicksCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse40
Tom SullivanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate27
F. WinterCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the President of the Senate
  3. Sent to the Governor
  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  5. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  6. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  7. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
  8. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  9. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
  10. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  11. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
  12. House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

Showing 12 most recent of 14 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source