Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1058: Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity Defense

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1058 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 8, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity Defense. Primary sponsor: Judy Amabile (Democratic), Dafna Michaelson Jenet, Regina English (Democratic), Mary Bradfield (Republican). It lists 17 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (March 14, 2025): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

When a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity is accepted by a court, the act requires the court, in consultation with the department of human services (CDHS) and the parties, to determine whether a sanity examination requires the defendant to stay overnight for an extended examination and the number of days of the extended examination. If the defendant is in custody, the act authorizes the sanity examination to be conducted at the jail or place of confinement or at a facility operated by or under contract with CDHS. If the defendant is at liberty on summons or on bond, the act authorizes the sanity examination to be conducted at a facility operated by or contracted with CDHS or at an out-of-custody location that the court and CDHS determine is appropriate. If a sanity examination is recorded, the act prohibits a defendant from being dressed in prison or jail clothing and prohibits restraints on the defendant from being visible on the recording. Current law authorizes psychiatrists, forensic psychologists, and other personnel conducting a sanity examination to conduct a narcoanalytic interview of the defendant with drugs that are medically appropriate, to subject the defendant to a polygraph examination, and to testify to the results of the procedures, statements, and reactions of the defendant. The act repeals this provision. The act makes conforming amendments and technical corrections. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 19 · Republican 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Judy AmabilePrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Dafna Michaelson JenetPrimary sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Regina EnglishPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Mary BradfieldPrimary sponsorRepublicanHouse21
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Chad CliffordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse37
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Monica DuranCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Julie GonzalesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Junie JosephCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Janice MarchmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate15
Julie McCluskieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse13
Robert RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate32
Gretchen RydinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse38
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Sent to the Governor
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  6. Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments
  7. Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  8. Senate Committee on Judiciary Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed
  9. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  10. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
  11. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  12. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

Showing 12 most recent of 14 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source