Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1026: Repeal Copayment for Department of Corrections Inmate Health Care

Vetoed Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Vetoed

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1026 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 8, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Repeal Copayment for Department of Corrections Inmate Health Care. Primary sponsor: Nick Hinrichsen (Democratic), Iman Jodeh (Democratic), Lorena García (Democratic), Michael Carter (Democratic). It lists 29 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 29, 2025): Governor Vetoed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

Current law requires the department of corrections (department) to assess a copayment for inmate-initiated visits to providers of medical, dental, mental health, and optometric care services. Current law permits a waiver or reduction of the copayment under a range of circumstances. The department's current administrative regulations assess fees when an inmate fails to attend or refuses a scheduled health-care appointment. The act eliminates the copayment and prohibits the department from assessing a fee when an inmate fails to attend or refuses a health-care appointment. The department is required to report during its 2026 "SMART Act" hearing on the number of times in the previous year that an inmate failed to attend a scheduled health-care appointment or requested an appointment when the request was not relevant to an actual medical condition. The act reduces appropriations to the department by a net of $165,682, which includes an increase of $157,179 appropriated from the general fund and a decrease of $322,861 from cash funds. VETOED by Governor 5/29/2025(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 32

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Nick HinrichsenPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Iman JodehPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Lorena GarcíaPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Michael CarterPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse36
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Andy BoeseneckerCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Chad CliffordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse37
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Regina EnglishCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Cecelia EspenozaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Julie GonzalesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
Junie JosephCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Naquetta RicksCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse40
Gretchen RydinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse38
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Marc SnyderCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate12
Rebekah StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse30
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Tom SullivanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate27
Elizabeth VelascoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse57
Katie WallaceCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate17
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
F. WinterCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Steven WoodrowCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse2
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Vetoed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  6. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  7. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  8. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
  9. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
  10. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
  11. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  12. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

Showing 12 most recent of 16 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source