Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1023: Local Government Review of Fencing Projects

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1023 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 8, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Local Government Review of Fencing Projects. Primary sponsor: Cleave Simpson (Republican), Julie Gonzales (Democratic), Jennifer Bacon (Democratic), Matt Martinez (Democratic). It lists 35 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 27, 2025): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

On or after July 1, 2025, the act requires a person, before commencing a project to install or substantially repair a contiguous fence of at least a specified certain size in the Sangre de Cristo land grant lands (covered fencing project), to submit an application for the covered fencing project to the local government with jurisdiction over the covered fencing project (application) if the local government has opted into the act's requirements. No later than 14 days after the local government's receipt of an application, the local government must publish notice of the application on the local government's website. No later than 60 days after the local government's receipt of an application, the local government must either approve or reject the application based on certain criteria; except that, despite the criteria, a local government may approve an application if it determines that the benefits of the covered fencing project outweigh the harms. If the local government finds that a covered fencing project presents no significant environmental impacts, then the local government shall not require a person commencing the covered fencing project to submit an application or pay a fee. The act does not apply to a covered fencing project that is necessary for a public utility or department of transportation project, an energy sector public works project, the safety or security of a public school or prison, or fences provided by the division of parks and wildlife. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 35 · Republican 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Cleave SimpsonPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate6
Julie GonzalesPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Jennifer BaconPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Matt MartinezPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse62
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
S. BirdCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Andy BoeseneckerCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Jeff BridgesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Sean CamachoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse6
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Monica DuranCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Cecelia EspenozaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Tony ExumCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Lorena GarcíaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
William LindstedtCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Bob MarshallCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse43
Tisha MauroCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse46
Karen McCormickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse11
Jacque PhillipsCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse31
Robert RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate32
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Gretchen RydinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse38
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Lesley SmithCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse49
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Brianna TitoneCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse27
Alex ValdezCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse5
Elizabeth VelascoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse57
Katie WallaceCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate17
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
F. WinterCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Steven WoodrowCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse2
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  6. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
  7. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  8. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
  9. Senate Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  10. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Agriculture & Natural Resources
  11. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  12. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

Showing 12 most recent of 14 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source