Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1013: Department of Corrections Visitation Rights

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1013 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 8, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Department of Corrections Visitation Rights. Primary sponsor: Tony Exum (Democratic), James Coleman (Democratic), Jennifer Bacon (Democratic), Regina English (Democratic). It lists 34 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 4, 2025): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

The act establishes visitation as a right for a person confined in a correctional facility (confined person). The department of corrections (department) may: Limit visitation for a confined person who is in restrictive housing or as a sanction following a conviction for a class 1 code of penal discipline violation; Reduce, but not eliminate, the number of visits available per week to a confined person as a result of an increase in the person's custody classification level; Temporarily deprive visitation as necessary for facility operations or for the safety of the facility, persons in the facility, and the general public; and Deny or cancel visitation for a confined person at any time as necessary to comply with requirements imposed by a court order, for victim safety, to prevent communication with a co-defendant, to preserve the integrity of a criminal investigation, to comply with treatment protocols, or for any other reason required by law. Video visits may supplement, but must not take the place of, in-person visits when in-person visits are permitted. If a confined person provides the department with reasonable notice that a requested visitation is for virtual attendance at a funeral or during or immediately following the birth of a child in the person's family, the act requires the department to make all reasonable efforts to allow the person to participate in the visitation via virtual attendance, or, if virtual attendance is not possible, via telephone. The department may adopt policies to govern visitations, including policies necessary to allow visitation as part of routine facility operations. The act states that it does not create a private right of action. The act permits a confined person to file a grievance with the department if the confined person alleges deprivation of visitation. The department is required to include information about visitation and grievances in its annual SMART Act hearing. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 34

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Tony ExumPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate11
James ColemanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Jennifer BaconPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Regina EnglishPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
S. BirdCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Andy BoeseneckerCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Michael CarterCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse36
Chad CliffordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse37
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Jessie DanielsonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate22
Cecelia EspenozaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Meg FroelichCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Julie GonzalesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Nick HinrichsenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
D. Michaelson JenetCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Junie JosephCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Sheila LiederCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse28
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
William LindstedtCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Bob MarshallCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse43
Matt MartinezCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse62
Julie McCluskieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse13
Naquetta RicksCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse40
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Rebekah StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse30
Tom SullivanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate27
Elizabeth VelascoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse57
Katie WallaceCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate17
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
F. WinterCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. Senate Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
  6. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  7. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
  8. Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  9. Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  10. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  11. Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Refer Amended to Appropriations
  12. Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Witness Testimony and/or Committee Discussion Only

Showing 12 most recent of 19 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source