Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2025 Regular Session · Bill

HB 25-1001: Enforcement Wage Hour Laws

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 25-1001 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 8, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Enforcement Wage Hour Laws. Primary sponsor: Chris Kolker (Democratic), Jessie Danielson (Democratic), Meg Froelich (Democratic), Monica Duran (Democratic). It lists 51 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 22, 2025): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

The act: Amends the definition of "employer" for purposes of wage and hour laws to include an individual who owns or controls at least 25% of the ownership interest in an employer; Prohibits an employer from making a payroll deduction below a worker's applicable minimum wage; Allows the director of the division of labor standards and statistics (division) to waive the penalty for an employer's failure to pay claimed wages or compensation within 14 days after a written demand if certain specified conditions are met; and Requires a court to find that an employee pursued a wage claim that lacked substantial justification before awarding an employer reasonable costs and attorney fees in a civil action for unpaid wages or compensation. In such an action, the court may pursue all equitable relief to deter future violations and prevent unjust enrichment. Current law limits the ability of the director of the division to adjudicate claims for nonpayment of wages or compensation to $7,500 or less. The act increases this threshold over the years by increasing the maximum amount to $13,000 for claims filed from July 1, 2026, through December 31, 2027, and in an amount specified by the director of the division to adjust for inflation beginning January 1, 2028. The act also requires the division, in adjudicating wage claims, to determine whether a violation is willful. For each violation: The director shall publish on the division's website the names of all employers found to be in violation and whether the violation was willful; and If the violation was willful and is not remedied within 60 days after the division's finding that there was a violation, the division must notify all government bodies with the authority to deny, withdraw, or otherwise limit or impose remedial conditions on the employer's license, permit, registration, or other credential of the unremedied willful violation. Additionally, the division may report an employer found to have violated a law related to wages and hours to any government body with authority to deny, withdraw, or otherwise limit or impose remedial conditions on the employer's license, permit, registration, or other credential. The act also repeals language requiring the division to issue a determination on a wage complaint within 90 days and clarifies that a city or county may enact and enforce wage laws within the city or county's jurisdiction. An employer found to have misclassified an employee as a nonemployee must pay a fine in the following amounts, in addition to any other relief ordered: For a willful violation, $5,000; For a violation not remedied within 60 days after the division's finding, $10,000; For a second or subsequent willful violation within 5 years, $25,000; or For a second or subsequent willful violation not remedied within 60 days after the division's finding, $50,000. The director of the division must adjust these fine amounts for inflation by January 1, 2028, and every other year thereafter. The act also decreases the amount of time the division must wait before paying an employee out of the wage theft enforcement fund from 6 months to 120 days. Current law prohibits an employer from discriminating or retaliating against an employee for taking protection under wage and hour laws or the law related to the employment of minors. The act expands this provision to specify additional protected behavior and expands the prohibition to include other persons in addition to employers. The act also: Requires a fact finder to consider the time between an individual's exercise of a protected activity and an employer's adverse action when determining whether an employer has retaliated against the employee or worker; Specifies that it is a violation to use an individual's immigration status to discriminate or retaliate against an employee or worker who has engaged in protected activity; and Allows the division to order reasonable attorney fees and costs after investigating a discrimination or retaliation claim. Between August 1, 2027, and October 1, 2027, the division must report to the joint budget committee on its progress in implementing the act. In state fiscal year 2025-26, $328,210 is appropriated to the department of labor and employment for use by the division to implement the act. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 51

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Chris KolkerPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate16
Jessie DanielsonPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate22
Meg FroelichPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Monica DuranPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
S. BirdCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Andy BoeseneckerCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Jeff BridgesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Chad CliffordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse37
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Lindsey DaughertyCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate19
Regina EnglishCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Cecelia EspenozaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse4
Tony ExumCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Lorena GarcíaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Julie GonzalesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Eliza HamrickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse61
Nick HinrichsenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
D. Michaelson JenetCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Junie JosephCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Sheila LiederCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse28
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
William LindstedtCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Meghan LukensCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse26
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Janice MarchmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate15
Matt MartinezCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse62
Tisha MauroCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse46
Julie McCluskieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse13
Karen McCormickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse11
Amy PaschalCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse18
Jacque PhillipsCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse31
Robert RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate32
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Gretchen RydinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse38
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Lesley SmithCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse49
Marc SnyderCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate12
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Tom SullivanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate27
Brianna TitoneCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse27
Elizabeth VelascoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse57
Katie WallaceCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate17
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Jenny WillfordCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse34
F. WinterCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Steven WoodrowCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse2
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  6. Senate Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
  7. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
  8. Senate Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  9. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
  10. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  11. Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Unamended to Appropriations
  12. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology

Showing 12 most recent of 19 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source