Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · Bill
HB 1257: Local Regulation of Massage Facilities
Enacted Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
HB 1257 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on February 18, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Local Regulation of Massage Facilities. Primary sponsor: Kyle Mullica (Democratic), Larry Liston (Republican), M. Rutinel, Ryan Gonzalez (Republican). It lists 19 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 4, 2026): Governor Signed.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.
Current law defines illicit massage businesses as businesses that engage in massage but also engage in human-trafficking-related offenses. The act expands the definition of 'illicit massage business' to include a massage business that engages in crimes other than human-trafficking-related offenses. Current law states that if a local government adopts a resolution or ordinance to establish business licensure requirements or to prohibit unlawful activities relating to illicit massage businesses, the resolution or ordinance must not be more restrictive than the requirements set forth in state law. The act removes this limitation. The act clarifies that a local government may adopt a resolution or ordinance for the purposes of deterring illicit massage businesses; preventing human trafficking; protecting legitimate massage therapy businesses; and safeguarding public health, safety, and welfare. The act also allows a local government to impose local licensing requirements in addition to those requirements prescribed in state law. Current law allows a local government to impose an administrative fee not to exceed $150 for issuing or renewing a license. The act removes the $150 cap on such fees. If a local government imposes an administrative fee, the amount of the fee must be reasonably related to the costs of the local government in administering the resolution or ordinance and the licensing of massage facilities. The fee must not exceed $500 unless necessary to cover the local government's costs of administering the resolution or ordinance and licensing the massage facilities in its jurisdiction. The fee may be adjusted yearly for inflation or deflation. Current law exempts businesses that held licenses before August 10, 2022, from the administrative fees. The act removes this exemption. The act allows a local government to establish additional grounds to deny, revoke, or suspend a license. The act provides that, if a local government establishes business licensure requirements for massage facilities, the resolution or ordinance adopted by the local government must prohibit ownership of massage facilities by the types of persons that are prohibited from ownership in current law. Current law states that preventing the operation of illicit massage businesses is a matter of statewide concern, and licensing and regulation of massage facilities is a matter of mixed statewide and local concern. The act states that preventing the operation of illicit massage businesses is a matter of mixed statewide and local concern. The act requires a local government that adopts a resolution or ordinance related to the local regulation of massage facilities on or after August 13, 2026, to consider the impacts of the resolution or ordinance on legitimate massage therapy businesses and conduct outreach to massage therapists and massage therapy businesses in the local government's jurisdiction and statewide organizations of massage therapists.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 14 · Republican 8
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Mullica | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 24 |
| Larry Liston | Primary sponsor | Republican | Senate | 10 |
| M. Rutinel | Primary sponsor | Not applicable (committee) | — | — |
| Ryan Gonzalez | Primary sponsor | Republican | House | 50 |
| Brandi Bradley | Co-sponsor | Republican | House | 39 |
| Max Brooks | Co-sponsor | Republican | House | 45 |
| Kyle Brown | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 12 |
| Michael Carter | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 36 |
| Chad Clifford | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 37 |
| James Coleman | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 33 |
| Monica Duran | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 23 |
| Rebecca Keltie | Co-sponsor | Republican | House | 16 |
| Sheila Lieder | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 28 |
| Bob Marshall | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 43 |
| Kenny Nguyen | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 33 |
| Jacque Phillips | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 31 |
| Lori Garcia Sander | Co-sponsor | Republican | House | 65 |
| Emily Sirota | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 9 |
| Scott Slaugh | Co-sponsor | Republican | House | 64 |
| Tammy Story | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 25 |
| Alex Valdez | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 5 |
| Ron Weinberg | Co-sponsor | Republican | House | 51 |
| Steven Woodrow | Co-sponsor | Democratic | House | 2 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Governor Signed
- Signed by the Speaker of the House
- Signed by the President of the Senate
- Sent to the Governor
- House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
- House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
- Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
- Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
- Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments
- Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
- Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing
- House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
Showing 12 most recent of 16 actions. Full history