Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · Bill

HB 1250: Procedures Related to Civil Asset Forfeiture

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 1250 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on February 18, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Procedures Related to Civil Asset Forfeiture. Primary sponsor: Mark Baisley (Republican), Katie Wallace (Democratic), Scott Bright (Republican), Ken DeGraaf (Republican), Jennifer Bacon (Democratic). It lists 34 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 4, 2026): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

The act clarifies an existing requirement for the criminal conviction of a property owner by requiring that one or more criminal charges be brought as a prerequisite to any nuisance abatement or forfeiture proceeding.     Existing law provides an exception to the conviction requirement for noninnocent owners who are not subject to criminal charges that no criminal conviction is necessary of the nonowner criminal defendant if the plaintiff proves its case by clear and convincing evidence that the property subject to the forfeiture proceeding is traceable proceeds of the charged offense or related criminal activity. The act clarifies this exception to first require a conviction of the nonowner criminal defendant before the noninnocent owner's property may be forfeited, while retaining other various exceptions that allow forfeiture actions to proceed against the interest of a claimant.     The act establishes a right for indigent civil asset forfeiture defendants to access forfeiture defense counsel and creates a procedure for the appointment of forfeiture defense counsel in nuisance abatement and forfeiture proceedings. The state court administrator shall enter into a contract for services with a private contractor who regularly provides legal services for indigent clients or litigants to provide a legal defense to a civil asset forfeiture proceeding. The private contractor is subject to certain reporting requirements.     The act creates a forfeiture defense counsel fund (fund) to pay for contracted forfeiture defense counsel who are authorized to represent persons against whom a nuisance abatement or forfeiture proceeding has been filed in connection with criminal charges. The fund is capped at $500,000, and starting in state fiscal year 2027-28, no general fund money is allowed to finance the fund. The balance of the fund over $500,000 is credited to the law enforcement community services grant program fund. The act transfers any unexpended and unencumbered money from the law enforcement community services grant program fund to the forfeiture counsel defense fund.     The act alters the disposition of property and proceeds ordered forfeited in a nuisance abatement or forfeiture action. Currently, forfeited property and proceeds are applied first toward restitution and cost recovery for a list of stakeholders, and of the remainder, 50% is granted to the local governmental body with authority over the seizing agency, 25% is granted to the local behavioral health administrative services organization, and 25% is granted to the law enforcement community services grant program fund. The act amends the disposition of the remainder so that 50% is granted to the local governmental body with authority over the seizing agency, 25% is granted to the fund, and 25% is granted to the local behavioral health administrative services organization.     The act appropriates $556,750 to the judicial department from the fund for civil asset forfeiture defense contracting and $55,000 to the department of local affairs from the fund for civil asset forfeiture portal administration.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 26 · Republican 13

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Mark BaisleyPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate4
Katie WallacePrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate17
Scott BrightPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate13
Ken DeGraafPrimary sponsorRepublicanHouse22
Jennifer BaconPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Adrienne BenavidezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate21
Brandi BradleyCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse39
Jeff BridgesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Max BrooksCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse45
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
John CarsonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate30
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Regina EnglishCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Lisa FrizellCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate2
Lorena GarcíaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Julie GonzalesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Ryan GonzalezCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse50
Nick HinrichsenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Rebecca KeltieCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse16
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Chris KolkerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate16
Sheila LiederCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse28
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
Stephanie LuckCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse60
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Bob MarshallCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse43
Kenny NguyenCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse33
Naquetta RicksCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse40
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Scott SlaughCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse64
Marc SnyderCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate12
Matt SoperCo-sponsorRepublicanHouse54
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Brianna TitoneCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse27
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Lynda Zamora WilsonCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate9
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  6. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  7. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Appropriations
  8. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
  9. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
  10. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
  11. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
  12. House Committee on Finance Refer Amended to Appropriations

Showing 12 most recent of 14 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source