Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · Bill

HB 1210: Prohibit Surveillance Price & Wage Setting

Vetoed Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Vetoed

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 1210 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on February 13, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Prohibit Surveillance Price & Wage Setting. Primary sponsor: Katie Wallace (Democratic), Tom Sullivan (Democratic), Janice Marchman (Democratic), William Lindstedt (Democratic), Lisa Cutter (Democratic), Yara Zokaie (Democratic), Steven Woodrow (Democratic), Jenny Willford (Democratic), Brianna Titone (Democratic), Tammy Story (Democratic), Lesley Smith (Democratic), Emily Sirota (Democratic), M. Rutinel, Kenny Nguyen (Democratic), Tisha Mauro (Democratic), Matt Martinez (Democratic), Mandy Lindsay (Democratic), Lorena García (Democratic), Meg Froelich (Democratic), Chad Clifford (Democratic), Kyle Brown (Democratic), Mike Weissman (Democratic), Iman Jodeh (Democratic), Javier Mabrey (Democratic), Jennifer Bacon (Democratic). It lists 13 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 2, 2026): Governor Vetoed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

Surveillance data is defined in the act as data that is obtained through observation, inference, or surveillance of consumers or workers and that is related to personal characteristics, online behaviors, or biometrics of an individual or group, band, class, or tier to which the individual belongs. The definition of 'worker' in the act excludes federal and state employees and employees of public entities.     The act prohibits discrimination against a consumer or worker resulting from the use of a price or wage setting algorithm (PWSA) that uses statistical modeling, data analytics, artificial intelligence, or other data processing techniques to analyze surveillance data, the output of which is a substantial factor in:Individualized price setting used to determine the amount charged to a consumer; orIndividualized wage setting used to determine the wage offered to a worker.     The act specifies activities that are not individualized price or wage setting, as well as exemptions from the prohibition on price or wage setting. A person has not engaged in individualized price setting if the person can demonstrate, as described in the act, that differential prices are:Based on differences in the cost in providing a good or service to different consumers, such as delivery distance or temporal differences, such as ride or delivery time;Based on publicly disclosed eligibility criteria to all persons that meet the criteria, such as consumers purchasing in volume, or to all members of a broadly defined group of consumers, such as teachers;Afforded on equal terms to all participants in a loyalty, membership, or rewards program or are offered in response to a consumer complaint, service disruption, request for account cancellation, or similar reason;Offered pursuant to a specified needs-based discount program for reduced pricing related to income or financial need, such as hospital discounted care;Based on a subscription or other continuous agreement that includes a monthly or other recurring price that was not informed by a PWSA; orBased on a refusal to extend credit on specific terms or to enter into a financial transaction based on a consumer's data in a consumer report or data required as part of the application for the financial transaction.     A person has not engaged in individualized wage setting if the person can demonstrate, as described in the act, that the person offers individualized wages based solely on data specific to an individual worker that is directly related to worker seniority or the tasks the worker was required to perform, and the person discloses to the worker before hiring, and to all workers whose wages are set in whole or in part by a PWSA, what data is considered and how the PWSA considers the data.     A person that uses a PWSA shall develop and publish reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of all data considered by the PWSA, for workers to request and receive information about what data is collected, and to correct or challenge data considered by a PWSA.     A violation of the prohibition against individualized price or wage setting is a deceptive trade practice under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act' and is subject to the enforcement provisions and remedies provided in that act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 37

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Katie WallacePrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate17
Tom SullivanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate27
Janice MarchmanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate15
William LindstedtPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Lisa CutterPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Yara ZokaiePrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse52
Steven WoodrowPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse2
Jenny WillfordPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse34
Brianna TitonePrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse27
Tammy StoryPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Lesley SmithPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse49
Emily SirotaPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse9
M. RutinelPrimary sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Kenny NguyenPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse33
Tisha MauroPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse46
Matt MartinezPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse62
Mandy LindsayPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse42
Lorena GarcíaPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Meg FroelichPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Chad CliffordPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse37
Kyle BrownPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Mike WeissmanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Iman JodehPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Javier MabreyPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Jennifer BaconPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Adrienne BenavidezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate21
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Monica DuranCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Julie GonzalesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Nick HinrichsenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
Junie JosephCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Chris KolkerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate16
Sheila LiederCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse28
Karen McCormickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse11
Amy PaschalCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse18
Elizabeth VelascoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse57

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Vetoed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  6. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  7. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
  8. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 05/04/2026 - No Amendments
  9. Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
  10. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 04/27/2026 - No Amendments
  11. Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  12. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology

Showing 12 most recent of 17 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source