Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · Bill

HB 1135: Transparency of Chemicals Used in Hair Products

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 1135 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on February 4, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Transparency of Chemicals Used in Hair Products. Primary sponsor: Janice Marchman (Democratic), Adrienne Benavidez (Democratic), Junie Joseph (Democratic), Regina English (Democratic). It lists 27 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 29, 2026): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

On and after July 1, 2027, a manufacturer of a hair relaxer product or a hairpiece product (covered hair product) is prohibited from selling or distributing a covered hair product in the state that contains an intentionally added carcinogen or reproductive toxicant unless the covered hair product has a warning label that notifies the consumer that the covered hair product contains an intentionally added carcinogen or reproductive toxicant, which warning label must comply with certain requirements depending on whether the covered hair product contains an intentionally added carcinogen, an intentionally added reproductive toxicant, or both (warning label requirement).     The warning label requirement does not apply to a covered hair product that is sold or distributed to a commercial entity for professional use. On and after July 1, 2028, the attorney general may adopt rules updating the warning label requirement. A violation of the warning label requirement constitutes a deceptive trade practice.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 30

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Janice MarchmanPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate15
Adrienne BenavidezPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate21
Junie JosephPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Regina EnglishPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Kyle BrownCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse12
Michael CarterCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse36
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Jessie DanielsonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate22
Monica DuranCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse23
Tony ExumCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Lori GoldsteinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse29
Nick HinrichsenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Chris KolkerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate16
Sheila LiederCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse28
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
Javier MabreyCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Kenny NguyenCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse33
Jacque PhillipsCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse31
Naquetta RicksCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse40
Robert RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate32
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Marc SnyderCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate12
Alex ValdezCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse5
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  6. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
  7. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  8. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
  9. Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
  10. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
  11. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  12. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

Showing 12 most recent of 14 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source