Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · Bill

HB 1001: Housing Developments on Qualifying Properties

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

HB 1001 is a bill introduced in the Colorado House on January 14, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Housing Developments on Qualifying Properties. Primary sponsor: Julie Gonzales (Democratic), Tony Exum (Democratic), Javier Mabrey (Democratic), Andy Boesenecker (Democratic). It lists 35 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (March 25, 2026): Governor Signed.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Abstract published by the legislature (via Open States). Text as published by the legislature; reproduced verbatim.

The act requires a subject jurisdiction to, on or after December 31, 2027, subject to an administrative approval process, allow the construction of a residential development on a qualifying property that does not contain an exempt parcel; except that, if on December 31, 2027, a subject jurisdiction is actively in the process of updating the subject jurisdiction's zoning or development code to comply with the act, the subject jurisdiction is required to complete the updates and allow the construction of a residential development on a qualifying property that does not contain an exempt parcel by June 30, 2028. A qualifying property is real property that contains no more than 5 acres of land and is owned by:A school district;A state college or university;A board of cooperative services;A housing authority;A local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties;A nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; orA nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property.     If a subject jurisdiction requests, as part of an initial development application, that a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing provide documentation that the nonprofit meets required criteria, the nonprofit organization shall provide the documentation. A subject jurisdiction is not required to allow a residential development on a qualifying property if the subject jurisdiction implements a transferable development rights program on the qualifying property and if the transferable development rights program includes a policy for affordable resident housing that is restricted in ownership and occupancy in perpetuity.     A subject jurisdiction shall not:Disallow construction of a residential development on a qualifying property on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development is no more than 3 stories or 38 feet tall, except in certain circumstances;Disallow construction of a residential development on a qualifying property on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development complies with the height requirements of the zoning district in which the residential development will be built or the height requirements that apply to any parcel zoned to allow for residential development that is contiguous to the qualifying property on which the residential development will be built;Disallow construction of a residential development on a qualifying property based on the number of dwelling units the residential development will contain, except in accordance with standards listed in the act; orApply site design standards to a residential development on a qualifying property that are more restrictive than the site design standards the subject jurisdiction applies to similar housing constructed within the subject jurisdiction, including standards related to structure setbacks from property lines; lot coverage or open space; on-site parking requirements; numbers of bedrooms in a multifamily residential development; on-site landscaping, screening, and buffering requirements; solar access; minimum dwelling units per acre; or other objective setback standards that apply to residential dwellings, including setbacks from oil and gas facilities, oil and gas operations, stream corridors, riparian areas, wetlands, and sensitive wildlife habitats.     Provided that the uses are allowed conditionally or by right within the zoning district in which a qualifying property is located, a subject jurisdiction shall allow the following uses in a residential development on a qualifying property:Child care; andThe provision of recreational, social, or educational services provided by community organizations for use by the residents of the residential development and the surrounding community.     On or before December 31, 2027, the department of local affairs is required to publish guidance to assist subject jurisdictions in verifying the status of a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 38

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Julie GonzalesPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Tony ExumPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Javier MabreyPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse1
Andy BoeseneckerPrimary sponsorDemocraticHouse53
Judy AmabileCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Jennifer BaconCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse7
Matt BallCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Adrienne BenavidezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate21
Sean CamachoCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse6
Michael CarterCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse36
James ColemanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Lisa CutterCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Jessie DanielsonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate22
Regina EnglishCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse17
Meg FroelichCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse3
Lorena GarcíaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse35
Lori GoldsteinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse29
Nick HinrichsenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Jamie JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse41
Iman JodehCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Junie JosephCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse10
Cathy KippCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Mandy LindsayCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse42
William LindstedtCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Janice MarchmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate15
Karen McCormickCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse11
Kenny NguyenCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse33
Amy PaschalCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse18
Jacque PhillipsCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse31
M. RutinelCo-sponsorNot applicable (committee)——
Gretchen RydinCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse38
Emily SirotaCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse9
Lesley SmithCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse49
Marc SnyderCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate12
Rebekah StewartCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse30
Tammy StoryCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse25
Mike WeissmanCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
Steven WoodrowCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse2
Yara ZokaieCo-sponsorDemocraticHouse52

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Governor Signed
  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House
  3. Signed by the President of the Senate
  4. Sent to the Governor
  5. House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
  6. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
  7. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
  8. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/11/2026 - No Amendments
  9. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/10/2026 - No Amendments
  10. Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
  11. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing
  12. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

Showing 12 most recent of 15 actions. Full history

Sources

  1. Open States / Plural (data from the official legislature website)
  2. Official legislature source