California · November 3, 2026 general election · Statewide ballot measure
Proposition 2: what your vote means
State rainy day fund. On every California ballot. Official sources checked October 21, 2026.
Proposition 2 · Legislative constitutional amendment
State rainy day fund
INCREASES STATE’S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
As printed in the Official Voter Information Guide, California Secretary of State (title prepared by the Attorney General).
A YES vote means:
The state would keep saving in its rainy day fund until it reaches 20% of General Fund taxes (instead of 10%) and would make extra debt payments through 2040 (instead of 2030).
A NO vote means:
The current rules for building state budget reserves and making extra debt payments would not change.
What it would change
- Reserves: raises the rainy day fund target from 10% to 20% of General Fund taxes.
- Debt payments: extends required extra state debt payments from 2030 to 2040.
- Spending limit: deposits into the rainy day fund would no longer count toward the state appropriations (spending) limit.
- Fiscal impact (Legislative Analyst): state budget reserves would be higher; the state might make more debt payments than it would otherwise.
Official arguments, summarized
Short neutral summaries of the arguments printed in the official voters’ pamphlet. The committees that wrote them are responsible for their content. Read the full text at the link below.
Argument for
Supporters say a larger rainy day fund would keep education, health care, and public safety funded during downturns and limit overspending in surplus years.
Written by: Yes on Prop. 2 · yesonprop2.com
Argument against
Opponents say excluding reserve deposits from the state spending limit would make taxpayer rebates less likely and that the measure adds no new program funding.
Written by: David Tangipa, Assemblymember
Arguments and rebuttals, Proposition 2, Official Voter Information Guide
Who supports it and who opposes it
These lists come from official campaign filings (registered committees) and public endorsements, each linked to its source. They are not complete, and SaveYourState does not endorse anyone listed. Lists checked October 30, 2026.
Who supports it
- California Hospital Association California Official Voter Information Guide, Nov. 3, 2026: arguments and rebuttals for Proposition 2
- California Primary Care Association California Official Voter Information Guide, Nov. 3, 2026: arguments and rebuttals for Proposition 2
- California Professional Firefighters California Official Voter Information Guide, Nov. 3, 2026: arguments and rebuttals for Proposition 2
- Jesse Gabriel (D) Assemblymember, District 46; chair, Assembly Budget Committee California Official Voter Information Guide, Nov. 3, 2026: arguments and rebuttals for Proposition 2 · party: assembly.ca.gov
- Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce California Official Voter Information Guide, Nov. 3, 2026: arguments and rebuttals for Proposition 2
Who opposes it
- David J. Tangipa (R) Assemblymember, District 8; vice chair, Assembly Budget Committee California Official Voter Information Guide, Nov. 3, 2026: arguments and rebuttals for Proposition 2 · party: assembly.ca.gov
- Reform California California Official Voter Information Guide, Nov. 3, 2026: arguments and rebuttals for Proposition 2
- Steven S. Choi (R) State Senator, District 37 California Official Voter Information Guide, Nov. 3, 2026: arguments and rebuttals for Proposition 2 · party: senate.ca.gov
Official sources
- Official Voter Information Guide: Proposition 2
- Official title and summary (Attorney General)
- Analysis and fiscal effects, Legislative Analyst
- Text of the proposed law (PDF)
SaveYourState is independent and nonpartisan, not a government site, and does not take positions on ballot measures. This explainer describes effects only, using the official ballot title, explanatory statement, full text, and fiscal impact statement. If anything here differs from those documents, the official documents control.