Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 972: California Financing Law: commercial loans: investment advisers.

In committee Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 972 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on February 4, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: California Financing Law: commercial loans: investment advisers. Primary sponsor: Timothy Grayson (D). Most recent recorded action (May 14, 2026): May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law, the California Financing Law, generally regulates the business of finance lenders and brokers and prohibits any person from engaging in those businesses without obtaining a license from the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation. Existing law also imposes various requirements on licensees who offer or sell commercial loans, as defined.

This bill would authorize an investment adviser that is registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, known as an “SEC-registered investment adviser,” to apply for and obtain a finance lender license to act on its own behalf and on behalf of any client account if all lending activity conducted pursuant to the license is limited to commercial loans, in accordance with certain requirements. The bill would provide that a license obtained by an SEC-registered investment adviser to act as a finance lender covers any affiliate of the SEC-registered investment adviser that is also an SEC-registered investment adviser. The bill would require the SEC-registered investment adviser to maintain and file with the commissioner an appendix to its license application and renewals, listing each client account, as defined. Under the bill, as a condition of licensure, the SEC-registered investment adviser would be required to obtain and maintain a surety bond, complete background checks, meet minimum net worth and commercial loan threshold requirements, and file specified information with the commissioner under oath, subject to penalty of perjury. The bill also would authorize the commissioner to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to implement and administer these provisions. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution prohibits usury, which is the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things at a rate of interest in excess of specified rates, but exempts certain transactions and lenders from these provisions, and allows the Legislature to exempt additional classes of persons by statute. Existing law, the California Financing Law, establishes a class of exempt persons pursuant to the constitutional provision on usury that includes personal property brokers and specified lenders.

This bill would provide that the class of exempt persons under the California Financing Law includes each person within the meaning of client account, as defined, to which the above-described provision on investment advisors applies.

Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.

This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Timothy GraysonPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate9

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
  2. Set for hearing May 14.
  3. April 20 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
  4. Set for hearing April 20.
  5. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 3757.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  6. Set for hearing April 7.
  7. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3599.) (March 18). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  8. Set for hearing March 18.
  9. Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
  10. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 7.
  11. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page