California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill
SB 927: Intercountry adoption finalized in a foreign country.
Enacted Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
SB 927 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on January 29, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Intercountry adoption finalized in a foreign country. Primary sponsor: Steven Choi (R). It lists 14 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (August 24, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 127, Statutes of 2026.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
In order to establish a record by which an adoptee can prove the facts of a foreign adoption, existing law requires a state resident who has finalized an intercountry adoption in a foreign country to file a petition to readopt within the earlier of 60 days of the adoptee’s entry into the United States or the adoptee’s 16th birthday. If the adoptive parent fails to file the petition within the prescribed timeframe or to provide a copy of the petition to each adoption agency that provided adoption services to the adoptive parent, existing law requires the adoption agency that facilitated the adoption to file the petition within 90 days of the child’s entry into the United States and to provide a file-marked copy of the petition to the adoptive parent and any other adoption agency that provided services to the adoptive parent, as specified. Existing law requires the petition to include, among other things, a report from at least one postplacement home visit by an intercountry adoption agency or a contractor of that agency licensed to provide intercountry adoption services in the state. Existing law requires the clerk of the court to submit an order granting the petition to the State Registrar, as specified, and requires the State Registrar to issue a delayed registration of birth upon receipt of the order.
This bill would authorize an adoptee of any age to file a petition on their own behalf if both the adoptive parent or parents and the adoption agency that facilitated the adoption failed to file a petition to readopt pursuant to the above-described provisions. The bill would, notwithstanding the documentation requirements described above, authorize a court to grant a petition for readoption that does not include those documents if (1)the petitioner establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that they are the adoptee, (2)the petitioner proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that one or more of the required documents cannot be obtained due to the passage of time or other circumstances beyond the petitioner’s control, and (3)the petitioner is able to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, the fundamental facts necessary for the court to make the findings required to grant the petition. The bill would authorize evidence presented to the court for these purposes to include both documentary and nondocumentary evidence, including, among other things, testimony, declarations, court records, agency records, correspondence, and other corroborating sources of information the court deems sufficient.
Existing law requires the court to notify all appropriate authorities if it finds that the child may be a subject of human trafficking or may be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court as a dependent child, as specified.
This bill would also expand the notice requirements described above to include any adoptee who may be, or may have been, a subject of human trafficking.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 6 · Republican 9
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven Choi | Primary sponsor | Republican | Senate | 37 |
| Marie Alvarado-Gil | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 4 |
| Jesse Arreguín | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 7 |
| Josh Becker | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 13 |
| Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 19 |
| Christopher Cabaldon | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 3 |
| Megan Dahle | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 1 |
| Mark González | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 54 |
| Shannon Grove | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 12 |
| Brian Jones | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 40 |
| Jerry McNerney | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 5 |
| Kelly Seyarto | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 32 |
| Tony Strickland | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 36 |
| Thomas Umberg | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 34 |
| Suzette Martinez Valladares | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 23 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 127, Statutes of 2026.
- Approved by the Governor.
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
- Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 5250.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
- In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
- Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 5985.) Ordered to the Senate.
- Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
- From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 24).
- From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
- Referred to Com. on JUD.
- In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.