Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 921: Employment: employer contributions: employee withholdings: credit: agricultural employees.

In committee Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 921 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on January 28, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Employment: employer contributions: employee withholdings: credit: agricultural employees. Primary sponsor: Shannon Grove (R), Melissa Hurtado (D). Most recent recorded action (April 22, 2026): April 22 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 1. Noes 4. Page 4012.).

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

(1)The Personal Income Tax Law imposes taxes on taxable income, as provided. Under existing law, every employer who pays wages to a resident employee for services performed either within or without this state, or to a nonresident employee for services performed in this state, is required to deduct and withhold from those wages, except as provided, for each payroll, a tax computed in an amount substantially equivalent to the amount reasonably estimated to be due under the Personal Income Tax Law. Under existing law, every employer required to withhold those taxes is required to, for each calendar quarter, file a withholding report, a quarterly return, and a report of wages in a form prescribed by the Employment Development Department, and pay over the taxes required to be withheld.

This bill would authorize an employer to claim a credit in an amount equal to the amount of overtime wages, as defined, paid during that quarter to specified agricultural employees covered by a certain wage order. The bill would require the credit to be claimed on the employer’s report of contributions, quarterly return, and report of wages, or in an electronic funds transfer, as specified. The bill would specify a refund of any credit amounts exceeding the amount that would have been remitted for that quarter to the Employment Development Department for employee withholdings. The bill would make implementation of the above-described refund contingent upon appropriation by the Legislature.

(2)Existing law requires farm labor contractors to be licensed by the Labor Commissioner and to comply with specified employment laws applicable to farm labor contractors. Existing law requires a person acting in the capacity of a farm labor contractor to provide a grower with whom the contractor has contracted to supply farmworkers a payroll record for each farmworker providing labor under the contract. Existing law requires the above-described payroll record to include certain disclosures, including the net and gross wages earned by each farmworker. Under existing law, a person who violates farm labor contractor requirements is guilty of a misdemeanor.

This bill would, instead, require the above-described disclosure to include the net and gross wages earned, less the amount of credit the farm labor contractor received pursuant to the above provisions, by each farmworker. By imposing a new requirement on farm labor contractors, the violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(3)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 1 · Republican 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Shannon GrovePrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate12
Melissa HurtadoPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate16

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. April 22 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 1. Noes 4. Page 4012.)
  2. Set for hearing April 22.
  3. Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
  4. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 28.
  5. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page