California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill
SB 895: California Science and Health Research Bond Act.
Enacted Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
SB 895 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on January 15, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: California Science and Health Research Bond Act. Primary sponsor: Scott Wiener (D), Sasha Renée Pérez (D), Aisha Wahab (D). It lists 49 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 30, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1040, Statutes of 2026.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
(1)Existing law establishes various grant and loan programs for research, including, among others, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, California Firefighter Cancer Prevention and Research Program, and the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Program.
This bill would establish the California Foundation for Science and Health Research within the Government Operations Agency. The bill would require the Secretary of Government Operations to oversee the process of appointing the director of the foundation, and would authorize the Secretary of Government Operations to delegate the task of hiring and determining the salaries, bonuses, and benefits of additional personnel to the director, as specified. The bill would require the director and personnel of the foundation to be responsible for implementing the strategic objectives of the California Foundation for Science and Health Research Council, as described below, administering grants, loans, and contracts awarded by the council, and all other duties as deemed necessary for the operation of the foundation.
This bill would create the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Fund and require the moneys in the fund to be used by the foundation to award grants and make loans to, and enter into contracts with, public or private research companies, universities, academic medical centers, institutes, and organizations for scientific research and development and for certain economic sectors, as specified, in specific areas of research, including, but not limited to, biomedical, behavioral health, and climate research. The bill would also create the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Benefit Fund, to consist solely of private donations. The bill would make the moneys in the benefit fund available for the same purposes as the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Fund.
This bill would require that, prior to the first grant from the foundation and no later than one year from the date the bill takes effect, the council develop various provisions and requirements to facilitate the foundation’s goals of affordability and equitable access. The foundation shall impose various requirements on the grantees, loan recipients, and contractors, as specified, including, among other things, developing strategies to promote equitable access to the subject invention in various specified communities and making the data resulting from the bond-funded research available to the broader scientific community, except in cases involving national security interests. The council shall also establish standards requiring that all grants, awards, and contracts be subject to intellectual property agreements that balance the opportunity for the State of California to benefit from the inventions, technologies, patents, royalties, and licenses that result from research funded by certain public and private grants, as specified.
This bill would create the California Foundation for Science and Health Research Council, as specified, which shall be vested with full power, authority, and jurisdiction over the foundation. The bill would require the council to, among other things, develop the strategic objectives and priorities of the foundation and provide the opportunity for public comment on the foundation’s priorities, as specified, determine the research projects that will be funded by the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Fund, develop objectives and opportunities that offer support to early career researchers, and adopt certain regulations and standards, as specified. The bill would also require the council to consider how the foundation’s research priorities relate to or support various economic and industry considerations, as specified. The bill would provide that a majority of the members of the council constitutes a quorum for the transaction of any business, for the performance of any duty, or for the exercise of any power of the council, except as otherwise provided. The bill would authorize the council to establish one or more scientific peer review panels consisting of experts in specified fields of research for the purposes of reviewing and prioritizing proposals on the basis of the scientific merit of the proposal, the potential benefit to the health and well-being of the population, natural resources, and environment of the state, and the demonstrated background, training, and expertise of the researchers and investigators to conduct the proposed work.
This bill would require all research and development funded by the California Foundation for Science and Health Research and Innovation Acceleration Fund to be conducted under established standards of open scientific exchange, peer review, and public oversight. The bill would require the funds and contracts to be awarded on the basis of the research priorities established for the foundation by the council and the scientific merit of the proposed research, as determined by an open, competitive, scientific peer review process that ensures objectivity, consistency, and high quality.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 49 · Republican 3
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Wiener | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 11 |
| Sasha Renée Pérez | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 25 |
| Aisha Wahab | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 10 |
| Dawn Addis | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 30 |
| Cecilia Aguiar-Curry | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 4 |
| Patrick Ahrens | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 26 |
| Benjamin Allen | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 24 |
| Joaquin Arambula | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 31 |
| Josh Becker | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 13 |
| Steve Bennett | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 38 |
| Catherine Blakespear | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 38 |
| Mia Bonta | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 18 |
| Anna Caballero | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 14 |
| Lisa Calderon | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 56 |
| Jessica Caloza | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 52 |
| Juan Carrillo | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 39 |
| Sabrina Cervantes | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 31 |
| Damon Connolly | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 12 |
| Dave Cortese | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 15 |
| Maria Elena Durazo | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 26 |
| Stan Ellis | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 32 |
| Anamarie Ávila Farías | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 15 |
| Mike Fong | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 49 |
| Robert Garcia | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 50 |
| Mike Gipson | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 65 |
| Mark González | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 54 |
| Matt Haney | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 17 |
| John Harabedian | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 41 |
| Josh Hoover | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 7 |
| Jacqui Irwin | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 42 |
| Jerry McNerney | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 5 |
| Al Muratsuchi | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 66 |
| Liz Ortega | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 20 |
| Stephen Padilla | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 18 |
| Darshana R. Patel | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 76 |
| Cottie Petrie-Norris | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 73 |
| Akilah Weber Pierson | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 39 |
| Eloise Gómez Reyes | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 29 |
| Laura Richardson | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 35 |
| Celeste Rodriguez | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 43 |
| Susan Rubio | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 22 |
| Blanca Rubio | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 48 |
| Pilar Schiavo | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 40 |
| Nick Schultz | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 44 |
| LaShae Sharp-Collins | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 79 |
| José Luis Solache | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 62 |
| Catherine Stefani | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 19 |
| Henry Stern | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 27 |
| Thomas Umberg | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 34 |
| Greg Wallis | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 47 |
| Christopher Ward | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 78 |
| Rick Chavez Zbur | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 51 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1040, Statutes of 2026.
- Approved by the Governor.
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
- Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 9.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
- Urgency clause adopted.
- In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
- Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 67. Noes 6. Page 7010.) Ordered to the Senate.
- Ordered to third reading.
- Read third time and amended.
- Joint Rule 61(b)(16) suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 1. Page 6727.)
- Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.