Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 886: California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act.

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 886 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on January 13, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act. Primary sponsor: Stephen Padilla (D), Jerry McNerney (D). It lists 9 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 21, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 438, Statutes of 2026.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.

This bill, the California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act, would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2028, to establish new tariffs or update existing electric rules for the interconnection of participating customer facilities and the provision of retail electric service, transmission, distribution, and generation services to participating customers, as specified. The bill would require the commission, as part of establishing and updating electric rules, to, at a minimum, evaluate the risks and benefits of the tariffs to nonparticipating customers, ensure that the tariffs prevent the creation of stranded costs for, or cost shifts to, nonparticipating customers, and, for unbundled customers, ensure that charges generally included in the generation component of the unbundled customer’s consolidated bill are assessed as a separate line item on their bill. The bill would require, as part of a new or existing proceeding, the commission to establish a tariff for the interconnection of a participating customer seeking to receive retail electric service at the transmission level that meets certain requirements, as specified. The bill would authorize a participating customer to participate in a new demand response program authorized by the commission, as specified. The bill would authorize an electrical corporation to submit an exceptional case filing to approve a contract between the electrical corporation and a data center seeking interconnection at the transmission level for those facilities that seek to obtain retail electric service after January 1, 2027, but before the commission has approved the tariff, as specified.

Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.

Because the above provisions would be a part of the act, and a violation of a commission action implementing this bill’s requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 11

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Stephen PadillaPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Jerry McNerneyPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate5
Jesse ArreguínCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate7
Josh BeckerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate13
Lisa CalderonCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly56
Damon ConnollyCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly12
John HarabedianCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly41
Cottie Petrie-NorrisCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly73
Akilah Weber PiersonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate39
Chris RogersCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly2
Scott WienerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 438, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Approved by the Governor.
  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 10.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
  5. Unanimous consent granted to take up without reference to file.
  6. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 62. Noes 7. Page 7065.) Ordered to the Senate.
  8. Ordered to third reading.
  9. Read third time and amended.
  10. Joint Rule 61(b)(16) suspended. (Ayes 57. Noes 1. Page 6819.)
  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (August 13).

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page