Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 84: Disability access: construction-related accessibility claims: notice of violation and opportunity to correct.

Passed one chamber Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 84 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on January 17, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Disability access: construction-related accessibility claims: notice of violation and opportunity to correct. Primary sponsor: Roger Niello (R), Angelique Ashby (D), Anna Caballero (D), Sasha Renée Pérez (D), Aisha Wahab (D). It lists 20 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 18, 2025): From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law prohibits discrimination on the basis of various specified personal characteristics, including disability. Existing law imposes minimum statutory damages for construction-related accessibility claims if the violation of a construction-related accessibility standard denied the plaintiff full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a particular occasion, as specified. Existing law imposes various limits on a defendant’s liability for statutory damages under specified sets of conditions, including if the defendant, among other things, corrects the construction-related violations within a specified time.

This bill would prohibit a construction-related accessibility claim for statutory damages from being initiated in a legal proceeding against a defendant who employs 50 or fewer individuals, as specified, unless the defendant has been served with a letter specifying each alleged violation, and the alleged violations have not been corrected within 120 days of service of the letter. The bill would provide that a defendant is not liable for statutory damages, plaintiff’s attorney’s fees, or costs for an alleged violation that is corrected within 120 days of service of a letter alleging the violation. The bill would also prohibit a plaintiff from avoiding the notice and opportunity to correct provisions and the liability limitations by claiming they are seeking general discrimination damages based on a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 if the underlying claim is based on a defendant’s failure to comply with physical accessibility standards under California law.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 21 · Republican 4

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Roger NielloPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate6
Angelique AshbyPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate8
Anna CaballeroPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Sasha Renée PérezPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Aisha WahabPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate10
Benjamin AllenCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate24
Bob ArchuletaCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate30
Josh BeckerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate13
Catherine BlakespearCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate38
Rosilicie Ochoa BoghCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate19
Christopher CabaldonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate3
Leticia CastilloCo-sponsorRepublicanAssembly58
Lena GonzalezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Jacqui IrwinCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly42
Monique LimónCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate21
Jerry McNerneyCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate5
Stephanie NguyenCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly10
Blanca PachecoCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly64
Stephen PadillaCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Rhodesia RansomCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly13
Susan RubioCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate22
Kelly SeyartoCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate32
Henry SternCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate27
Thomas UmbergCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34
Scott WienerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  2. Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
  3. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
  4. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 2. Page 1498.) Ordered to the Assembly.
  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  6. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
  7. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1191.) (May 23).
  8. Set for hearing May 23.
  9. May 5 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
  10. Set for hearing May 5.
  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 833.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  12. Set for hearing April 22.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page