Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 747: Civil rights: deprivation of federal constitutional rights, privileges, and immunities.

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 747 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on February 21, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Civil rights: deprivation of federal constitutional rights, privileges, and immunities. Primary sponsor: Scott Wiener (D), Aisha Wahab (D). It lists 35 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 29, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 752, Statutes of 2026.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Under existing law, the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (act), if a person or persons, whether or not acting under color of law, interferes or attempts to interfere, by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state, the Attorney General, or any district attorney or city attorney, is authorized to bring a civil action for injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief in the name of the people of the State of California, in order to protect the exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured.

Under that act, an individual may also institute and prosecute in their own name and on their own behalf a civil action for damages, as described, for any resulting interference or attempt at interference of the individual’s exercise or enjoyment of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or this state. The act authorizes the court to award the petitioner or plaintiff reasonable attorney’s fees in addition to any damages, injunction, or other equitable relief awarded in these civil actions (attorney’s fees authorization).

Existing federal law provides that every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state, territory, or the District of Columbia, subjects or causes to be subjected any United States citizen or other person within the jurisdiction to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, is liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except as provided.

This bill would also provide that every natural person, as defined, who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, as defined, subjects or causes to be subjected any citizen of this state or any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except as specified. The bill would apply the aforementioned attorney’s fees authorization, except as specified, to any action brought under these provisions. The bill would authorize a court, in its discretion, to also award costs, except as specified, to the prevailing plaintiff in any action brought under these provisions.

This bill would authorize a defendant in an action brought under these provisions to assert and receive the benefit of a defense of absolute or qualified immunity only to the same extent as a person sued under certain federal provisions under like circumstances, as specified, and would specify that nothing in these provisions is to be construed to waive or abrogate any defense of sovereign immunity otherwise available to a party, as specified. The bill would prohibit any civil action brought under these provisions from being commenced later than 2 years after the date that the cause of action accrues. The bill would make its provisions severable. The bill would specify that these provisions apply retroactively to March 1, 2025, as provided.

This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature in enacting these provisions.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 37

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Scott WienerPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Aisha WahabPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate10
Patrick AhrensCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly26
Josh BeckerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate13
Catherine BlakespearCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate38
Tasha BoernerCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly77
Isaac BryanCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly55
Anna CaballeroCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate14
Sabrina CervantesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Damon ConnollyCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly12
Dave CorteseCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate15
Maria Elena DurazoCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Sade ElhawaryCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly57
Anamarie Ávila FaríasCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly15
Robert GarciaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly50
Lena GonzalezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Mark GonzálezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly54
Matt HaneyCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly17
Gregg HartCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly37
Corey JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly60
Ash KalraCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly25
Alex LeeCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly24
Mike McGuireCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate2
Jerry McNerneyCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate5
Liz OrtegaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly20
Stephen PadillaCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Gail PellerinCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly28
Sasha Renée PérezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Akilah Weber PiersonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate39
Sharon Quirk-SilvaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly67
Eloise Gómez ReyesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate29
Celeste RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly43
Chris RogersCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly2
Susan RubioCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate22
José Luis SolacheCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly62
Catherine StefaniCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly19
Rick Chavez ZburCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly51

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 752, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 752, Statutes of 2026.
  3. Approved by the Governor.
  4. Approved by the Governor.
  5. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
  6. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
  7. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 10. Page 5994.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
  8. Urgency clause adopted.
  9. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 10.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
  10. Urgency clause adopted.
  11. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
  12. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page