SB 577: Public entities.

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

(1)Existing law requires that specified actions for recovery of damages suffered as a result of childhood sexual assault that occurred before January 1, 2024, be commenced within 22 years of the date the plaintiff attains the age of majority or within 5 years of the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered that psychological injury or illness occurring after the age of majority was caused by the sexual assault, whichever period expires later. Existing law prohibits a plaintiff from commencing specified actions against a person or entity who did not commit the act of childhood sexual assault on or after the plaintiff’s 40th birthday unless the offending person or entity knew or had reason to know of any misconduct that created a risk of childhood sexual assault by an employee, volunteer, representative, or agent, or the person or entity failed to take reasonable steps or to implement reasonable safeguards to avoid acts of childhood sexual assault. Existing law provides that there is no time limit for commencement of actions for recovery of damages suffered as a result of childhood sexual assault which occurred on or after January 1, 2024. Actions subject to these time limits include actions for liability against any person or entity who owed a duty of care to the plaintiff and an action for liability against any person or entity for an intentional act that was the legal cause of the childhood sexual assault. Existing law provides that in actions against entities for violation of a duty of care, the plaintiff must establish that the entity acted wrongfully or negligently.

This bill would shorten the amount of time a victim of childhood sexual assault that occurred before January 1, 2024, would have to file a specified action to 22 years from the date the plaintiff attains the age of majority or within 3 years of the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered that psychological injury or illness occurring after the age of majority was caused by the sexual assault, whichever period expires later. The bill would, for actions seeking damages for childhood sexual assault that occurred before January 1, 2024, and filed on or after January 1, 2026, against a public entity, or one of its employees or agents, by a plaintiff who is 40 years of age or older, require the plaintiff to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the public entity knew of misconduct that resulted in childhood sexual assault and failed to take reasonable steps or implement safeguards to avoid it, as specified, and that the public entity negligently discharged a mandatory duty. For these cases, the bill would also require the court to review specified factors when adjudicating motions for remittitur and would authorize a court to structure judgments against public entities so that they could be paid over time.

(2)For actions for recovery of damages suffered as a result of childhood sexual assault, existing law requires a plaintiff 40 years of age or older at the time the action is filed to file certificates of merit executed by the plaintiff’s attorney and a mental health practitioner setting forth specified information. Existing law provides that the failure to file certificates in accordance with these provisions is grounds for a demurrer.

This bill would instead require the certificates to be filed concurrently with the complaint and would prohibit a court clerk from accepting the filing of a complaint that lacks the certificates, except as specified. Additionally, the bill would require the certificates of merit to declare that the plaintiff’s attorney is licensed to practice law in California and is in good standing with the State Bar.

(3)Existing law authorizes a victim of childhood sexual assault who proves it was as the result of a cover up, as defined, to recover up to treble damages against the defendant who is found to have covered up the sexual assault, unless prohibited by another law.

This bill would prohibit such treble damages from being imposed against a defendant that is a public entity.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 4

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

1. September 30, 2026Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 971, Statutes of 2026.
2. September 30, 2026Approved by the Governor.
3. September 8, 2026Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
4. August 30, 2026Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 10.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
5. August 30, 2026In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
6. August 30, 2026Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 49. Noes 20. Page 6889.) Ordered to the Senate.
7. August 27, 2026Ordered to third reading.
8. August 27, 2026Read third time and amended.
9. August 27, 2026Joint Rule 61(b)(16) suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 1. Page 6727.)
10. August 27, 2026Ordered to third reading.
11. August 27, 2026From inactive file.
12. August 27, 2026Assembly Rule 78 suspended.