Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 296: Property taxation: exemption: disabled veteran homeowners.

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 296 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on February 10, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Property taxation: exemption: disabled veteran homeowners. Primary sponsor: Bob Archuleta (D), Suzette Martinez Valladares (R), Pilar Schiavo (D). It lists 17 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 28, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 727, Statutes of 2026.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

The California Constitution provides that all property is taxable and requires that it be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value, unless otherwise provided by the California Constitution or federal law. The California Constitution and existing property tax law provide various exemptions from taxation, including, among others, a disabled veterans’ exemption and a veterans’ organization exemption.

This bill would exempt from taxation, as provided, 50% of that part of the full value of the property that does not exceed $1,000,000 that is owned by, and that constitutes the principal place of residence of, a veteran, the veteran’s spouse, or the veteran and the veteran’s spouse jointly, if, among other things, the veteran is 100% disabled. The bill would provide an unmarried surviving spouse a property exemption in the same amount that they would have been entitled to if the veteran were alive and if certain conditions are met. In the case of a disabled veteran or unmarried surviving spouse whose household income does not exceed a specified amount for the relevant assessment year, as prescribed, the bill would exempt 100% of that part of the full value of the property that does not exceed $1,000,000 from taxation. The bill would require certain documentation to be provided to the county assessor to receive the exemption and would prohibit any other real property tax exemption from being granted to the claimant if receiving the exemption provided by the provisions of this bill. The bill would make these exemptions applicable for property tax lien dates occurring on or after January 1, 2027, but occurring before January 1, 2032. By imposing additional duties on local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements.

This bill also would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 15 · Republican 5

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Bob ArchuletaPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate30
Suzette Martinez ValladaresPrimary sponsorRepublicanSenate23
Pilar SchiavoPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly40
Jesse ArreguínCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate7
Sabrina CervantesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Steven ChoiCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate37
Dave CorteseCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate15
Maria Elena DurazoCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Lena GonzalezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Timothy GraysonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate9
Shannon GroveCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate12
Brian JonesCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate40
Jerry McNerneyCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate5
Stephen PadillaCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Sasha Renée PérezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
Akilah Weber PiersonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate39
Laura RichardsonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate35
Susan RubioCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate22
Kelly SeyartoCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate32
Lola Smallwood-CuevasCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 727, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 727, Statutes of 2026.
  3. Approved by the Governor.
  4. Approved by the Governor.
  5. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
  6. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
  7. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 5681.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
  8. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
  10. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
  11. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6270.) Ordered to the Senate.
  12. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6270.) Ordered to the Senate.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page