California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill
SB 1399: Locked detention facilities: civil immigration: reviews.
Enacted Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
SB 1399 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on February 20, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Locked detention facilities: civil immigration: reviews. . Primary sponsor: Maria Elena Durazo (D). It lists 13 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 29, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 759, Statutes of 2026.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
Existing law requires, until July 1, 2027, the Attorney General, or their designee, to engage in reviews of county, local, or private locked detention facilities in which noncitizens are being housed or detained for purposes of civil immigration proceedings in California, and, on or before March 1, 2019, to conduct a review of these facilities, as specified, including a review of the circumstances of apprehension and transfer. Existing law also requires the Department of Justice to provide, during the budget process, updates and information to the Legislature and the Governor, concerning the reviews, as provided and pursuant to a specified date. Existing law requires the comprehensive report to be completed by March 1, 2019, and to be posted on the Attorney General’s internet website and made available to the public, as provided. Existing law makes these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2027, and repeals those provisions January 1, 2028.
This bill would delete all dates specified above, including inoperative and repeal provisions, thereby indefinitely extending those provisions, and would delete the requirement for the review to include an individual’s circumstances of apprehension and transfer. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 14
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Durazo | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 26 |
| Anna Caballero | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 14 |
| Lisa Calderon | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 56 |
| Sade Elhawary | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 57 |
| Anamarie Ávila Farías | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 15 |
| Mark González | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 54 |
| Ash Kalra | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 25 |
| Liz Ortega | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 20 |
| Stephen Padilla | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 18 |
| Sharon Quirk-Silva | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 67 |
| Michelle Rodriguez | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 53 |
| Susan Rubio | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Senate | 22 |
| José Luis Solache | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 62 |
| Rick Chavez Zbur | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 51 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 759, Statutes of 2026.
- Approved by the Governor.
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
- In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
- Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 59. Noes 19. Page 6905.) Ordered to the Senate.
- From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 13).
- Assembly Rule 63 suspended.
- Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
- From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- Coauthors revised.
- Referred to Com. on JUD.