California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill
SB 1357: Recall elections: notice of intention.
In committee Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
SB 1357 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on February 20, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Recall elections: notice of intention. Primary sponsor: Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh (R). It lists 2 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 14, 2026): May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
Existing law governs the recall of certain state and local elective officers. Existing law requires proponents of a recall to serve, file, and publish a copy of the notice of intention to recall the elective officer, as specified. Existing law requires the notice of intention to contain, among other things, the printed name, signature, and residence address, including street and number, city, and ZIP Code, of each proponent of the recall. Existing law requires publication of the notice of intention in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction of the officer sought to be recalled. If there is no newspaper of general circulation, the notice of intention must be posted in at least 3 public places within the jurisdiction.
This bill would require the proponents’ signatures and the street numbers and street names of their residence to be redacted or otherwise excluded from the notice of intention before it is made available to the public. The bill would require a notice of intention to contain a declaration in which proponents confirm, among other things, that they understand they are signing to initiate the recall petition process and that the notice of intention is a public record. If there is no newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction of the officer sought to be recalled, the bill would require the notice of intention to also be posted on at least 3 internet websites.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Republican 3
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh | Primary sponsor | Republican | Senate | 19 |
| Steven Choi | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 37 |
| Roger Niello | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 6 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
- Set for hearing May 14.
- May 4 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
- Set for hearing May 4.
- From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 3980.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- Set for hearing April 21.
- From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3755.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
- Set for hearing April 7.
- Referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and JUD.
- Read first time.
- From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
- Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.