Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 1141: Public contracts: University of California executives: conflicts of interest: prohibition.

In committee Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 1141 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on February 18, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Public contracts: University of California executives: conflicts of interest: prohibition. Primary sponsor: Aisha Wahab (D). It lists 3 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 14, 2026): May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

The California Constitution provides that the University of California constitutes a public trust administered by the Regents of the University of California, a corporation in the form of a board, with full powers of organization and government, subject to legislative control only for specified purposes, including, among others, as may be necessary to ensure the security of its funds.

Existing law prohibits officers or employees of the University of California from engaging in any employment, activity, or enterprise from which the officer or employee receives compensation or has a financial interest if that employment, activity, or enterprise is sponsored or funded by a university department or contract, except as provided.

This bill would require a University of California executive, within 60 days of accepting a board of director position with a business entity, to post on a University of California internet website a written recusal from involvement with any future university contract decisions where the business entity is a party, as provided. The bill would prohibit a University of California executive from making, participating in making, or in any way attempting to influence a contractual decision where the executive is on the board of directors of a business entity that is a party to the contract or receives compensation for consulting or advisory services from a business entity that is a party to the contract. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to bring a civil action to enforce these provisions and to recover attorney’s fees if the civil action prevails. If a court finds in such a civil action that an executive has violated these provisions, the bill would require the court to void the affected contract. The bill would define “business entity,” “contract,” and “University of California executive” for its purposes.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 4

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Aisha WahabPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate10
Bob ArchuletaCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate30
Maria Elena DurazoCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Lena GonzalezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
  2. Set for hearing May 14.
  3. May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
  4. Set for hearing May 11.
  5. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  6. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 3978.) (April 21).
  7. Set for hearing April 21.
  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  9. April 7 hearing postponed by committee.
  10. Set for hearing April 7.
  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 3688.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  12. Set for hearing March 25.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page