Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 1072: Housing omnibus.

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 1072 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on February 13, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Housing omnibus. Primary sponsor: Committee on Housing. Most recent recorded action (September 18, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 322, Statutes of 2026.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

(1)Existing law authorized the County of Napa, until June 30, 2007, to meet up to 15 percent of its existing share of the regional housing need for lower income households in a specified manner.

This bill would repeal this expired authority.

(2) The Housing Accountability Act, which is a part of the Planning and Zoning Law, among other things, prohibits a local agency from disapproving a housing development project, as described, unless it makes specified written findings. The act requires a petition to enforce its provisions to be brought pursuant to a specified procedure and be filed no later than 90 days from the later of (A) the effective date of a decision of the local agency imposing conditions on, disapproving, or any other final action taken on a housing development project or (B) the expiration of certain time periods specified in the Permit Streamlining Act.

This bill would also include in the above-described expiration of certain time periods, among other things, the expiration of specified time periods in the State Housing Law.

The Planning and Zoning Law requires the owner of land on which an assisted housing development is located, at least 12 months prior to an anticipated date of termination of a subsidy contract, an expiration of rental restrictions, or a prepayment on an assisted housing development, to provide notice of the proposed change to each affected tenant household residing in the assisted housing development at the time the notice is provided and to the affected public entities. If the owner decides to terminate a subsidy contract or prepay the mortgage pursuant to these provisions, or if the owner has an assisted housing development in which there will be the expiration of rental restrictions, existing law requires the owner to first give notice of the opportunity to specified entities. Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to monitor compliance with these provisions and provide a report to the Legislature, as prescribed, containing specified information. Existing law defines various terms for these purposes.

This bill would additionally require the owner to provide that notice to affected public entities, as defined. The bill would prescribe the process for serving the notice on a city, county, or city and county in which the assisted housing development is located, to the appropriate local public housing authority, if any, and the Department of Housing and Community Development. The bill would remove some of the information required to be in the report from the department described above. The bill would also make technical changes to these provisions.

Sponsors

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Committee on HousingPrimary sponsorNot applicable (committee)Senate—

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 322, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Approved by the Governor.
  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
  5. Ordered to special consent calendar.
  6. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6703.) Ordered to the Senate.
  8. Ordered to third reading.
  9. Read third time and amended.
  10. Assembly Rule 69(b)(1) suspended. (Ayes 55. Noes 17. Page 6296.)
  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 5).

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page