Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Senate Bill

SB 1007: Common interest developments: annual reports: assessments: discipline.

Passed one chamber Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

SB 1007 is a senate bill introduced in the California Senate on February 9, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Common interest developments: annual reports: assessments: discipline. Primary sponsor: Caroline Menjivar (D). It lists 2 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 24, 2026): June 24 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, governs the formation and operation of common interest developments. Existing law requires that a common interest development be managed by an association. Existing law requires an association of a common interest development to levy regular and special assessments to perform its obligations under the governing documents and the act, as provided. Existing law requires an association to prepare an annual budget report and a policy statement, as specified. Existing law requires the association to either deliver to all members the full report or a summary of the report that includes specified information, on the first page, whenever the annual budget report or a policy statement is prepared, as provided.

This bill would require the annual budget report to include a comparison breakdown of the anticipated expenses of the previous fiscal year versus actual expenditures of the previous fiscal year and a statement regarding compensation of a management company, as provided. The bill would require a summary of an annual budget to also include the comparison breakdown and the statement regarding compensation of a management company, as specified.

Existing law prohibits increases in regular assessments for any fiscal year, unless the board complies with certain requirements, including certain information in its annual budget report. Existing law prohibits an association from increasing regular assessments by more than 20 percent, without the approval of a majority of a quorum of members.

This bill would prohibit an association from increasing a regular assessment, unless the board includes the above-referenced information pertaining to regular assessments. The bill would, instead, prohibit a board from increasing regular assessments by more than 8%, without the approval of the majority of a quorum of members.

Existing law requires the association to notify a member 10 days before a meeting to consider or impose discipline on a member, or a monetary charge, as a means of reimbursing the association for costs incurred by the association in the repair of damage to the common area and facilities caused by a member, as provided. Existing law requires the notification to include, among other information, the nature of the alleged violation, or nature of the damage to the common area and facilities.

This bill would require the association to make any physical evidence used to determine a violation of the governing documents has occurred available to the member at least 5 business days before the hearing or deadline for the member’s response, if the association seeks to impose a monetary penalty against a member for violation of the governing documents, as provided.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 3

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Caroline MenjivarPrimary sponsorDemocraticSenate20
Lena GonzalezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Timothy GraysonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate9

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. June 24 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
  2. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
  3. Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D., JUD., and APPR.
  4. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 4482.) Ordered to the Assembly.
  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  7. Ordered to second reading.
  8. Read third time and amended.
  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 4085.) (April 28).
  11. Set for hearing April 28.
  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 3589.) (March 17). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page