Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 964: Commission on State Mandates: state mandates.

Did not advance Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Did not advance

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 964 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 20, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Commission on State Mandates: state mandates. Primary sponsor: Heather Hadwick (R). Most recent recorded action (February 2, 2026): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law creates the Commission on State Mandates and establishes procedures for implementing the requirement in the California Constitution that the state reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Existing law makes a reimbursement claim for actual costs filed by a local agency or school district subject to the initiation of an audit by the Controller, and authorizes the Controller to make a field review of a claim after it has been submitted but before it has been reimbursed. Existing law requires the Controller to notify the claimant in writing within 30 days after issuance of a remittance advice of any adjustment to a claim for reimbursement that results from an audit or review.

This bill would, instead, require the Controller to notify the claimant in writing within 30 days of any adjustment that results from an audit or review. The bill would also require the Controller to allow a local agency or school district, at the sole discretion of the local agency or school district, to offset any reduced reimbursement, as prescribed, or to remit funds to the Controller.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Republican 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Heather HadwickPrimary sponsorRepublicanAssembly1

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
  3. In committee: Held under submission.
  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
  5. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  6. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
  7. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
  8. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
  9. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
  11. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and ED.
  12. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page