Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 768: Mobilehome parks: rent protections: local rent control.

Passed one chamber Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 768 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 18, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Mobilehome parks: rent protections: local rent control. Primary sponsor: Anamarie Ávila Farías (D). Most recent recorded action (June 26, 2026): In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, governs tenancies in mobilehome parks and includes provisions that are applicable to those who have an ownership interest in a subdivision, cooperative, or condominium for mobilehomes, or a resident-owned mobilehome park, as specified. Among other things, these provisions set forth the rights of residents and homeowners regarding the use of the property.

Existing law exempts the rental of certain mobilehome spaces by a homeowner, if the mobilehome space is not the principal residence of the homeowner and the homeowner has not rented the mobilehome to another party, from any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure adopted by any city, county, or city and county, that establishes a maximum amount that the landlord may charge a tenant for rent, as specified.

This bill would, instead, apply that exemption to the rental of a mobilehome space that is not used as permanent housing, as defined, by the homeowner or an approved tenant, except as specified.

Existing law provides that, for purposes of the above provisions, a mobilehome is deemed to be the principal residence of the homeowner unless a review of state or county records demonstrate otherwise, as specified. Existing law provides that before modifying the rent or other terms of tenancy as a result of learning that the mobilehome space is not the principal residence of the homeowner through the above-described review, the management, as defined, shall notify the homeowner, in writing, of the proposed changes and provide the homeowner with a copy of the documents upon which management relied. Existing law prohibits management from modifying the rent or other terms of tenancy as described above if the homeowner provides documentation reasonably establishing that the information provided by management is incorrect or that the homeowner is not the same person identified in the documents, as specified.

This bill would, instead, provide that before modifying the rent or other terms of tenancy as a result of learning that the mobilehome space is not used as permanent housing as described above, the management shall notify the homeowner, as specified, and shall provide the homeowner with an explanation of its determination and a copy of the documents upon which management relied in making its determination. The bill would, instead, prohibit management from modifying the rent or other terms of tenancy as described above if the homeowner provides a statement refuting management’s claim that the mobilehome is not being used as permanent housing as described above. The bill would, in that regard, create a rebuttable presumption in favor of the homeowner’s statement.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Anamarie Ávila FaríasPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly15

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  2. Referred to Com. on JUD.
  3. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
  4. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 64. Noes 1. Page 3794.)
  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  6. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (January 13).
  8. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
  10. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  12. Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page