Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 65: School and community college employees: paid disability and parental leave.

Passed one chamber Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 65 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on December 3, 2024. According to its official title, it concerns: School and community college employees: paid disability and parental leave. Primary sponsor: Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D). It lists 8 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (August 17, 2026): Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Ashby.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, and the governing board of a community college district, to provide for a leave of absence from duty for a certificated employee or an academic employee of the district who is required to be absent from duty because of pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth, and recovery from those conditions.

Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district, and the governing board of a community college district, to provide for a leave of absence from duty as it deems appropriate for a female employee in the classified service of the district who is required to be absent from duty because of pregnancy or convalescence following childbirth. Existing law authorizes a governing board to adopt rules and regulations about leaves of absence for classified employees for these purposes, and authorizes a governing board to provide in the rules and regulations whether the leave granted shall be with or without pay, as provided.

This bill would delete the latter provisions authorizing a governing board of a school district and the governing board of a community college district to adopt those rules and regulations. The bill instead would require a public school employer to, for a certificated employee or an employee in the classified service of the public school employer, and would require a community college district to, for an academic employee or an employee in the classified service of the community college district, provide up to 14 weeks of a leave of absence with specified pay benefits for an employee who is required to be absent from duty because of pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery from those conditions, as provided. The bill would authorize the paid leave to begin before and continue after childbirth if the employee is actually disabled by pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or a related condition. The bill would prohibit a leave of absence taken pursuant to these provisions from being deducted from other leaves of absence, as provided, and would require public school employers and community college districts to maintain group health coverage for an employee who takes a leave of absence under these provisions for the duration of the leave of absence at the same level and under the same conditions that coverage would have been provided if the employee had not taken a leave of absence. The bill would prohibit any other eligibility requirements, including, but not limited to, minimum hours worked or length of service, before an employee disabled by pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or related medical conditions is eligible for a paid leave of absence under these provisions.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 8 · Republican 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Cecilia Aguiar-CurryPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly4
Tasha BoernerCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly77
Mia BontaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly18
Sabrina CervantesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Jeff GonzalezCo-sponsorRepublicanAssembly36
Josh LowenthalCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly69
Al MuratsuchiCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly66
Celeste RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly43
LaShae Sharp-CollinsCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly79

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Ashby.
  2. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  3. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 13).
  4. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
  5. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  6. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L., P.E. & R. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
  7. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  8. Referred to Coms. on ED., L., P.E. & R. and APPR.
  9. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
  10. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 62. Noes 0. Page 1779.)
  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 23).

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page