Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 46: Diversion.

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 46 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on December 2, 2024. According to its official title, it concerns: Diversion. Primary sponsor: Stephanie Nguyen (D). It lists 10 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 29, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 18, Statutes of 2026.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law authorizes a court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant suffering from a mental disorder, on an accusatory pleading alleging the commission of a misdemeanor or felony offense, in order to allow the defendant to undergo mental health treatment. Existing law provides that a defendant is eligible for diversion if they have been diagnosed with certain mental disorders and the court finds that the mental disorder was a significant factor in the commission of the charged offense, unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the disorder was not a motivating, causal, or contributing factor to the defendant’s involvement in the alleged offense. Existing law prohibits defendants charged with specified offenses, including murder, from being placed in this diversion program.

This bill would require that the diagnosis or rediagnosis with a mental disorder be within 5 years before the alleged offense.

Existing law makes a defendant suitable for this diversion program if, among other criteria, a qualified mental health expert opines that the defendant’s symptoms of the mental disorder that caused, contributed to, or motivated the criminal behavior, would respond to mental health treatment and the defendant will not pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety if treated in the community, as specified.

The bill would revise that standard and instead require the court to find that the defendant will not pose a substantial and undue risk to the physical safety of another person if treated in the community. The bill would require the mental health expert’s opinion to include that the proposed mental health diversion plan is clinically appropriate to address the symptoms of the defendant’s mental disorder, as specified. The bill would require the court to state the reasons for denial on the record.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 11

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Stephanie NguyenPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly10
Angelique AshbyCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate8
Jasmeet BainsCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly35
Catherine BlakespearCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate38
Melissa HurtadoCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate16
Maggy KrellCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly6
Blanca PachecoCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly64
Cottie Petrie-NorrisCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly73
Michelle RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly53
Blanca RubioCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly48
Thomas UmbergCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate34

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 18, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Approved by the Governor.
  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.
  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 1. Page 5790.).
  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4506.).
  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
  9. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 14).
  10. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (March 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  12. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page