Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 397: Personal Income Tax Law: young child tax credit.

Did not advance Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Did not advance

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 397 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 3, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Personal Income Tax Law: young child tax credit. Primary sponsor: Mark González (D), Celeste Rodriguez (D), LaShae Sharp-Collins (D). It lists 25 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (February 2, 2026): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

The Personal Income Tax Law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law, including a young child tax credit to a qualified taxpayer in a specified amount multiplied by the earned income tax credit adjustment factor, as provided. That law also allows a payment from the continuously appropriated Tax Relief and Refund Account for an amount in excess of tax liability. Existing law defines “qualified taxpayer” for this purpose to include an eligible individual, as defined, who has a qualifying child, defined to be a child younger than 6 years of age as of the last day of the taxable year, and who meets other specified criteria.

This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, would instead define a “qualifying child” to mean a child younger than a specified age as of the last day of the taxable year, as described. By increasing the payments from the Tax Relief and Refund Account, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation.

Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements.

This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 28

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Mark GonzálezPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly54
Celeste RodriguezPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly43
LaShae Sharp-CollinsPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly79
Patrick AhrensCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly26
David AlvarezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly80
Jasmeet BainsCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly35
Mia BontaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly18
Isaac BryanCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly55
Sabrina CervantesCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate31
Sade ElhawaryCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly57
Mike FongCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly49
Corey JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly60
Alex LeeCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly24
Stephanie NguyenCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly10
Liz OrtegaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly20
Stephen PadillaCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate18
Darshana R. PatelCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly76
Rhodesia RansomCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly13
Michelle RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly53
Chris RogersCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly2
Blanca RubioCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly48
Pilar SchiavoCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly40
Nick SchultzCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly44
Lola Smallwood-CuevasCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
José Luis SolacheCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly62
Esmeralda SoriaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly27
Catherine StefaniCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly19
Christopher WardCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly78

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
  3. In committee: Held under submission.
  4. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1627.)
  5. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
  6. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
  7. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  8. Coauthors revised.
  9. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
  10. Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
  11. From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
  12. Read first time. To print.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page