AB 392: Pornographic internet websites: consent.

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law generally regulates obscene content on internet websites, including by requiring a social media platform to provide, in a mechanism that is reasonably accessible to users, a means for a user who is a California resident to report material to the social media platform that the user reasonably believes is, among other things, child sexual abuse material.

This bill would require a person who operates an internet website to exercise ordinary care and reasonable diligence to ensure that any sexually explicit content, as defined, uploaded to the operator’s pornographic internet website does not include a depicted individual, as defined. The bill would require a user to, before uploading sexually explicit content to a pornographic internet website, submit, among other things, a statement certifying, not under penalty of perjury, that any individual depicted in the sexually explicit content was not a minor at the time the sexually explicit content was created, consented to being depicted in the sexually explicit content, and consents to the sexually explicit content being uploaded to the internet on the pornographic internet website. The bill would make knowingly providing false information in that statement an infraction punishable by a fine, as specified. By creating a new infraction, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require an operator of a pornographic internet website to verify a user’s email address before permitting the user to upload sexually explicit content to the operator’s pornographic internet website.

This bill would authorize a depicted individual and a public prosecutor to bring a civil action to enforce the bill, as prescribed.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Republican 1

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

1. August 29, 2025In committee: Held under submission.
2. August 18, 2025In committee: Referred to suspense file.
3. July 14, 2025Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4. July 14, 2025Withdrawn from committee.
5. July 10, 2025Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
6. July 9, 2025From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 8).
7. June 30, 2025From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
8. June 18, 2025Referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S.
9. June 9, 2025In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
10. June 5, 2025Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2111.)
11. May 27, 2025Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
12. May 23, 2025Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.