Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 2760: Law enforcement: wearable electroshock devices.

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 2760 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 20, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Law enforcement: wearable electroshock devices. Primary sponsor: LaShae Sharp-Collins (D), Alex Lee (D), Nick Schultz (D). It lists 26 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 29, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 749, Statutes of 2026.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law requires each law enforcement agency, on or before January 1, 2021, to maintain a policy that provides a minimum standard on the use of force. Existing law requires that the policy include, among other things, training standards and requirements relating to demonstrated knowledge and understanding of the law enforcement agency’s use of force policy by officers, investigators, and supervisors. Existing law prohibits a law enforcement agency from authorizing the use of a carotid restraint or choke hold by any peace officer employed by that agency.

This bill would, until January 1, 2030, prohibit a law enforcement agency, including a federal law enforcement agency, from using a wearable electroshock device within the State of California. The bill would also prohibit a law enforcement agency from using state funds to purchase a wearable electroshock device. The bill would require a law enforcement agency to update their use of force policies to prohibit the use of a wearable electroshock device. By increasing the duties on local law enforcement, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Division of Law Enforcement within the Department of Justice to conduct a study on the safety and community impacts of wearable electroshock devices and provide recommendations for appropriate standards and safeguards for their use, and would require the department to report to the Legislature on the findings and recommendations of the study on or before January 1, 2029.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 29

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
LaShae Sharp-CollinsPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly79
Alex LeePrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly24
Nick SchultzPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly44
Cecilia Aguiar-CurryCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly4
Jesse ArreguínCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate7
Mia BontaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly18
Isaac BryanCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly55
Juan CarrilloCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly39
Maria Elena DurazoCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate26
Sade ElhawaryCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly57
Robert GarciaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly50
Mike GipsonCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly65
Lena GonzalezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate33
Mark GonzálezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly54
Gregg HartCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly37
Corey JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly60
Ash KalraCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly25
Josh LowenthalCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly69
Liz OrtegaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly20
Akilah Weber PiersonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate39
Rhodesia RansomCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly13
Celeste RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly43
Susan RubioCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate22
Pilar SchiavoCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly40
Lola Smallwood-CuevasCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate28
José Luis SolacheCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly62
Christopher WardCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly78
Scott WienerCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate11
Lori WilsonCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly11

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 749, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Approved by the Governor.
  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 16. Page 7036.).
  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
  6. Measure version as amended on August 28 corrected.
  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 9.).
  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (August 27).
  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page