Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 2721: Unfair Competition Law: hotels.

Vetoed Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Vetoed

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 2721 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 20, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Unfair Competition Law: hotels. Primary sponsor: Juan Carrillo (D). It lists 7 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 30, 2026): Vetoed by Governor.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law, the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), makes various practices unlawful and provides that a person who engages, has engaged, or proposes to engage in unfair competition is liable for a civil penalty and subject to injunction, as specified. The UCL authorizes actions prosecuted under its provisions to be brought by certain public attorneys, including by the Attorney General, a city attorney of a city having a population in excess of 750,000, or by a county counsel of any county within which a city has a population in excess of 750,000. The UCL prohibits the distribution, as provided, of any handbill, as defined, to any individual guest rooms in any hotel where the innkeeper has expressed objection to handbill distribution, as specified. The UCL provides that these provisions do not prohibit the distribution of a handbill to guest rooms in any hotel where the distribution has been requested or approved in writing by the innkeeper, or to any individual guest room when the occupant thereof has affirmatively requested or approved the distribution of the handbill during the duration of the guest’s occupancy.

This bill would require, under the UCL, the operator of a hotel, as defined, with actual knowledge of a reservation with the United States Customs and Border Protection or United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement to post a prescribed notice in a prominent and accessible place where it can be seen by all workers, as provided. The bill would also require an operator of a hotel with the above-described knowledge to disclose, upon request of a guest with a reservation at the time of check-in, the potential presence of the United States Customs and Border Protection or United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on its premises during the guest’s reservation. The bill would prohibit the liability of a hotel for violations of these provisions from exceeding $5,000, as provided. The bill would repeal its own provisions on January 1, 2029.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 8

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Juan CarrilloPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly39
Anamarie Ávila FaríasCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly15
Mike GipsonCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly65
Mark GonzálezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly54
Matt HaneyCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly17
Alex LeeCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly24
Josh LowenthalCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly69
José Luis SolacheCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly62

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Vetoed by Governor.
  2. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
  3. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 19. Page 6926.).
  4. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 11.).
  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  7. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 13).
  12. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page