California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill
AB 2700: Public Utilities Commission: electrical corporations: wildfire victim restitution shortfalls: report: restitution mechanisms.
Enacted Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
AB 2700 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 20, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Public Utilities Commission: electrical corporations: wildfire victim restitution shortfalls: report: restitution mechanisms. Primary sponsor: Joe Patterson (R). It lists 6 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 30, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 959, Statutes of 2026.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law requires the Wildfire Fund Administrator, in consultation with the commission and other entities, to prepare and submit to the Legislature and the Governor a report that evaluates and sets forth recommendations on new models or approaches that mitigate damage, accelerate recovery, and responsibly and equitably allocate the burdens from natural catastrophes, including catastrophic wildfires, across stakeholders, as provided.
This bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2028, to generate a report assessing the verified restitution shortfalls for victims of wildfires caused by electrical corporations occurring before July 12, 2019, and to recommend restitution mechanisms for electrical corporations to address restitution shortfalls, as provided. The bill would require the commission, in developing the restitution mechanisms, to ensure, among other things, that the verified restitution shortfalls are consistently and fairly paid to ensure full compensation is issued in a timely manner.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 2 · Republican 5
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Patterson | Primary sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 5 |
| Juan Alanis | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 22 |
| Tasha Boerner | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 77 |
| Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh | Co-sponsor | Republican | Senate | 19 |
| Tom Lackey | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 34 |
| Chris Rogers | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 2 |
| Kate Sanchez | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 71 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 959, Statutes of 2026.
- Approved by the Governor.
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
- Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6987.).
- Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 6985.)
- From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 30).
- Re-referred to Com. on U. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
- In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
- Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).
- Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
- From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).