California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill
AB 2575: Health care services: artificial intelligence.
Vetoed Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
- Vetoed
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
AB 2575 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 20, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Health care services: artificial intelligence. Primary sponsor: Liz Ortega (D). Most recent recorded action (September 30, 2026): Vetoed by Governor.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
Existing law charges the Labor Commissioner with enforcement of various labor laws, including investigation of employee complaints.
This bill would declare it is the policy of the state that a worker providing direct patient care be free to use their professional judgment to make assessments and decisions within their scope of practice as appropriate for their patients. The bill would prohibit an employer from retaliating or discriminating against a worker providing patient care, as specified. The bill would authorize a worker who is subject to retaliation or discrimination in violation of these provisions to file a complaint with the Labor Commissioner against an employer. The bill would require the Labor Commissioner to enforce these provisions, as specified.
Existing law provides that everyone is responsible not only for the result of their willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by their want of ordinary care or skill in the management of their property or person. Existing law prohibits a defendant who developed, modified, or used artificial intelligence, as defined, from asserting a defense that the artificial intelligence autonomously caused the harm to the plaintiff.
This bill would prohibit a defendant who developed, modified, selected, or deployed a clinical decision support system that is alleged to have harmed the plaintiff from asserting a defense that the failure of a licensed health care professional or other health care worker to override an output of the clinical decision support system is a superseding cause severing the defendant’s liability for the alleged harm.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 1
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Ortega | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 20 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Vetoed by Governor.
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
- Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 16. Page 7061.).
- Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 7061.)
- In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
- Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 10.).
- Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
- Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.)
- Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 18. Noes 10.).
- Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.